[Land-speed] New LSR

John Burk joyseydevil at comcast.net
Thu Apr 2 20:52:19 MST 2009


Dan

The America's Cup has lots of rules . The boats have a certain spec , they 
race every 4 years in the previous winners  country etc .  There is a seldom 
used clause in the rules that allows somebody to challenge the champ in the 
middle of the 4 year cycle and the boats don't need to meet the normal 7 
meter rules . In what ever year that was a New Zealander named Michael Fay 
challenged Dennis O'Connor . The bigger a sail boat is the faster it is so 
Fay built one bigger than  normal but a catamaran is faster than a single 
hull so that's what O'Connor built and walked away on every race . 
O'Connor's catamaran was only raced once but that's true of all America's 
Cup boats .

John


> There was a piece on 60 Minutes last year about some rich guy who built an
> America's Cup contender using the same principles. His boat had dual hulls 
> and
> a sail(?) like the subject. It was so fast in testing that it was deemed
> illegal before racing. I think the cost was in excess of $22M.
>
> DW
>
> --- On Thu, 4/2/09, bobbyhotrods at comcast.net <bobbyhotrods at comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> From: bobbyhotrods at comcast.net <bobbyhotrods at comcast.net>
> Subject: Re: [Land-speed] New LSR
> To: "Kirkwood" <saltfever at comcast.net>
> Cc: "land-speed" <land-speed at autox.team.net>
> Date: Thursday, April 2, 2009, 12:34 PM
>
> I noted the same. I think it would pitch-pole if it was so rigged.
> No heeling to spill air either. BJ in Beantown, (traded the ocean for the
> garage)
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kirkwood" <saltfever at comcast.net>
> To: "land-speed" <land-speed at autox.team.net>
> Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2009 3:14:39 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: [Land-speed] New LSR
>
> It appears that the outrigger is on the UPWIND side. You can see this by 
> the
> upward bending in the strut, leaning of the vertical wing, and the dust
> blowing down-wind. Why isn't it on the down-wind side? To offset blow-over
> forces you have to add a lot of weight as wells as build in down-force 
> (with
> the corresponding DRAG) on the strut. If he was heading in the other
> direction the strut could be built with less drag and ballast? 
> Interesting!
> -Elon
> Land-speed mailing list
>
> You are subscribed as bobbyhotrods at comcast.net
>
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed
> Land-speed mailing list
>
> You are subscribed as dwarner230 at yahoo.com
>
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed
> _______________________________________________
> Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> Land-speed mailing list
>
> You are subscribed as joyseydevil at comcast.net
>
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed


More information about the Land-speed mailing list