[Healeys] Clutch Slave push rod problem
Al Fuller
al at bighealey.org
Wed Jun 24 12:06:57 MDT 2015
Hi Phil:
You don't mention the reason for having to replace the clutch master and
slave cylinders, so my answer below does not take into account any
interaction between what may have caused that and your rod length
dilemma...
All that said, if it ran 25 years for you with the nut making the clutch
rod longer, what is stopping you from just putting it back like it was and
driving another 25 years!?!
Al Fuller
al at bighealey.org
'65 A-H BJ-8
'85 Rx-7 GSL-SE
----------------------------------------
From: "philip fish" <philipfish at waitrose.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 11:41 AM
To: healeys at autox.team.net
Subject: [Healeys] Clutch Slave push rod problem
Hi all,
Last week a friend and myself installed a new clutch master cylinder and
slave cylinder on my 1961 Austin Healey 3000 BT7. On removing the slave we
noticed that a small nut had been put on to the end of the slave cylinder
push rod by a previous owner (I have owned that car for 25 years so it was
some time ago!).
Why we wondered?
We put on the new slave (without the nut) and bled the system. Low and
behold without the nut we where unable to engage gear as there was very
little movement on the clutch pedal. Realizing that the the nut had been
put there for a reason we removed the push rod from the slave and replaced
the nut (1/4 " in width) and hey presto we then got more movement on the
pedal and could engae all the gears. the push rod appeared to be a standard
size.
I have now got a extended push rod, but as its 14mm longer than the
standard one it may not work.
Does anybody know whats going on? We assume that the real problem lies
inside the gear box. What would be a better solution (without going inside
the box)?
Any help welcome.
Phil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/healeys/attachments/20150624/092dba8e/attachment.html>
More information about the Healeys
mailing list