[Fot] TR8 Water temperature
R. John Lye
rjl at gt-classics.com
Wed Jul 13 07:28:07 MDT 2016
I looked into at one time, for exactly those reasons. I knew an
autocrosser in St. Louis
who had done that on his home built open wheel car, but eventually
decided not to
go that route. I can't remember why though - possibly just lazy...
John
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 13:40:03 -0500, Dustin Nicholson wrote:
Anyone ever consider an electric water pump? I don't know much
about them but it seems you'd get a constant flow rate regardless of
engine speed, maybe even an adjustable speed with a reostat. Plus you'd
gain back lost HP. Some of our cars started life running 5 accessories
on a belt (alternator, fan, smog pump, A/C compressor, and water pump).
I'm down to only running the water pump off my belt, would be nice to
have no belt at all!
Dusty
FP Spit
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
-------- Original message --------
From: Bill Babcock
Date: 7/11/16 5:22 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: MadMarx
Cc: fot at autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Fot] TR8 Water temperature
Yes, outlet temperature of the block is lower, outlet temperature of
the radiator is higher. Delta-T across the radiator is lower. Think of
it this way, Q (heat transfer) is stable at some operating point. The
excess heat from the engine is equal to the heat removed from the
radiator. Ignore the heat transfer coefficient for the moment. So Q
for radiator = mass x (Tin-Tout) and Q for engine is mass x (Tout-Tin).
Q and M is the same for both engine and radiator and Tin of = Tout of
engine, likewise Tout of radiator = Tin of engine.
Obvious, right. So hold everything stable and increase flow rate.
Obviously Tin-Tout must decrease as does Tout-Tin. The operating
temperature will depend solely on the temperature drop across the
radiator. If you and a lower operating temp at that Q you need a lower
Tout of the radiator.
If you increase engine load and RPM, the mass flow rate increases with
RPM, but not linearly since it’s a centrifugal pump. Slip gets worse
with RPM. The high flow rate system has a lower delta-t across the
engine, but also has a lower delta-t across the radiator. Temperature
will likely climb higher than with a lower flow rate system (depending
on where you measure it, but heat transfer rate is lower, so you might
reach a point where it’s inadequate to meet the engine demand. then
Tout climbs quickly and shit happens.
On Jul 11, 2016, at 2:48 PM, MadMarx wrote:
I think alot depends on where the system finds ist balance point.
If more flow removes heat quicker from the engine maybe the outlet
temperature of the block is lower?
So the difference of the radiator outlet might not be so much of a problem?
The water stays shorter in the block and don’t pick up that much temperature?
Interesting thing to test.
Cheers
Chris
Von: Bill Babcock [mailto:ponobill at gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 11. Juli 2016 23:41
An: MadMarx
Cc: Mordy Dunst; van.mulders.marcel at telenet.be; fot at autox.team.net
Betreff: Re: [Fot] TR8 Water temperature
Well, you’ll need to get comfortable with a higher no-load
temperature, because the radiator outlet temperature will be high.
Two factors to consider: Heat, which is the amount of energy
transferred, and temperature, which relates to heat transfer only in
terms of the differential temperature. Slow speed means less mass flow
and therefore less heat transfer but a higher differential temperature
across the radiator, high speed means more heat transfer but less
differential temperature across the radiator.
On Jul 10, 2016, at 2:54 PM, MadMarx wrote:
Hi Mordy,
there are two theories about cooling and water flow.
1. Slow speed of the water in the radiator to give the water
time to cool. That means slowing down
2. The other theory sais maximizing the flow, no
restriction, high coolant speed.
In a way I prefer the 2nd way. And I’ll test this version in the
coming weeks. I’ll remove the restrictors and see what happens.
Cheers
Chris
Von: Mordy Dunst [mailto:gasket.works at gte.net]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 10. Juli 2016 22:45
An: tr4racing at googlemail.com; van.mulders.marcel at telenet.be
Cc: fot at autox.team.net
Betreff: Re: [Fot] TR8 Water temperature
Chris your the engineer....
Heat produced vs heat removed. There will be a steady state at some
point. You would like it lower. Don"t underestimate the headgasket
component of channeling coolant flow. In the TR4 motor i made the
coolant holes different than original to allow the mass flow of water
to occur from the rear of the motor forward. I also put a pressure
gauge on my coolant. If the pressure is too low it will not cool as
efficiently either. I don"t know what the coolant dwell time with
in the head needs to be to in order to adsorb the heat generated. Nor
the dwell time in the radiator. There certainly calcs for all this
stuff.
MDunst
Headgasket.com
626.628.3777 F
Triple R Munitions, Inc
626.201.9471 T
FFL 6,7 SOT 2
-----Original Message-----
From: MadMarx
To: 'Marcel Van Mulders' ; 'MadMarx'
Cc: fot
Sent: Sat, Jul 9, 2016 8:21 pm
Subject: Re: [Fot] TR8 Water temperature
I have a 160F thermostat installed.
Next test will be without any restrictions, maximum flow and see how it
goes with that.
Chris
Von: Marcel Van Mulders [mailto:van.mulders.marcel at telenet.be]
Gesendet: Samstag, 9. Juli 2016 13:01
An: 'MadMarx'
Cc: fot at autox.team.net
Betreff: RE: [Fot] TR8 Water temperature
My diesel BMW runs always at 100°C/212°F when hot. What coolant
thermostat is in it? If the T° is steady at 212°F, perhaps it is
intentionally done so with a 212° thermostat.
Marcel
-------------------------
Van: Fot [mailto:fot-bounces at autox.team.net] Namens MadMarx
Verzonden: donderdag 7 juli 2016 19:21
Aan: 'FOT List'
Onderwerp: [Fot] TR8 Water temperature
Hi guys,
My TR8 is running way too hot about 212F at full speed and at idle the
temps are getting that high also. I have no idea to get them down.
Radiator core is 68x48cm x 5 cm. I suppose that should be enough. I've
experiment with different restrictor plates with no change. Changing
pump speed didn't help either. The difference between radiator in and
outlet is 10°C (50F). Not enough I would say. Maybe making the pump
more slower? It was running on a ratio of 0.8 slower than crank,
currently 1:1 speed. Any ideas? 10 Liters are circulating.
Cheers
Chris
_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net
http://www.fot-racing.com
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/gasket.works@gte.net
_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net
http://www.fot-racing.com
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/bill@ponostyle.com
-------------------------
_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net
http://www.fot-racing.com
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage:
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/rjl@gt-classics.com
--
Thanks,
John
rjl at gt-classics.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20160713/10b9bf3a/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Fot
mailing list