triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TR aluminum or rubber crank seal?

To: triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: TR aluminum or rubber crank seal?
From: George Richardson <gprtech@frontiernet.net>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 17:17:57 -0400
References: <156.1f911229.2bfe861e@aol.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
  The original seal works when the engine is running, but not when it 
isn't. As a result, a little oild drips out every time you park. It 
doesn have the advantage of never wearing out though.

I kept the original seal for one reason only, and that's that it was 
easiest. The new seal setups require too much cost and risk for too 
little return.

CarlSereda@aol.com wrote:

>Does anyone believe in staying with the original aluminum crankshaft seal on 
>TR3-4A's anymore?
>When properly set up aren't they virtually drip free? It's an old design used 
>for at least a decade.
>Is it really worth grinding down the crank and retrofitting a new housing for 
>a rubber seal?
>Carl
>
>  
>

-- 
George Richardson
1957 Triumph TR3 - TS15559L http://www.key-men.com/triumph
1975 Triumph TR6 - Undergoing restoration    
1972 Triumph Stag - Daily Driver
Key Men: Keys for Classics - http://www.key-men.com

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>