triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Triumph TR6 on the dyno [long]

To: David Massey <105671.471@compuserve.com>, Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>
Subject: Re: Triumph TR6 on the dyno [long]
From: Trevor Jordan <tjordan@bigpond.net.au>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 21:18:33 +1100
Cc: "triumphs@autox.team.net" <triumphs@autox.team.net>, "[unknown]" <ingate@horizon.com>
References: <200009170455_MC2-B396-4242@compuserve.com>
At 4:55 AM -0400 17/9/00, David Massey wrote:
>Message text written by Trevor Boicey
>>  As the years of the TR6 went on, the 150hp of the UK spec
>car got knocked down a few pegs, I think it finished up around
>125hp. I am unsure of the details why, it wasn't emissions. Maybe
>it was trying to improve the reliability of the PI and the
>manners of that crazy cam?
><
>
>According to Bill Poggott it was a combination of the camshaft change and
>the change in measurement to the DIN standard so the actual reduction in HP
>was not as dramatic as it would seem.
>
>Dave Massey

Dave

I seem to remember reading that the original PI engine was 134 bhp 
DIN, so the drop was about 9 bhp.  The later engines had the same cam 
for both PI and carb, so the difference in power output must have 
been due to compression ratio and PI.  But how much is attributable 
to each?

Has anyone checked the power output from a high compression (9 or 10 
to 1) carb engine with the later cam?  I have been told that PI 
mostly improved the low speed torque.

Trevor Jordan
74 TR6 CF29281U

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>