triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TR6 versus 240Z

To: <jbonina@nectech.com>
Subject: Re: TR6 versus 240Z
From: "Ed Woods" <fogbros@nb.net>
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 13:08:30 -0400charset="iso-8859-1"
Cc: "Triumph Mailinglist" <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net>
They did, it was called the TR8. Unfortunately, there was a gas shortage at
the time and we all thought the world was to run oil of oil sooner rather
than later so we started buying rice burners.

Ed Woods

TR3, former TR8, and several rice burners
-----Original Message-----
From: jbonina@nectech.com <jbonina@nectech.com>
To: triumphs@autox.team.net <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Date: Wednesday, May 27, 1998 9:55 AM
Subject: TR6 versus 240Z


>
>This morning I drive the 240Z for the first time since I've owned it. I
offer my
>objective observances below.
>
>Looks - TR6
>Stares from others - TR6
>Power - 240Z
>Relaibility - 240z (sat for 6-months, spun, I mean spun right over)
>Handling - TR6 (straight line anyway)
>Fun with the top down - Duh, TR6
>Peace of mind - 240Z
>
>Why can't someone build the driving fun of a TR combined with the raw power
and
>relaibility of the Z car? I hate to ask this, but is this what a Miata
does?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>