triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 72 Spitfire Brake Problem

To: Nolan Penney <npenney@erols.com>
Subject: Re: 72 Spitfire Brake Problem
From: Paul Burr <tigerpb@ids.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 22:44:31 +0000
Cc: "Barry H. Adams" <badams@cyberport.com>, triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
References: <332C8782.29FF@erols.com>
Nolan Penney wrote:
> 
> >A friend recently purchased a 72 Spitfire with less than 3k total miles!!
> >Everything worked ok until about 2 weeks ago when the brake warning light
> >came on.  He checked for leaks and the functioning of the pwd valve and
> >bled the system.  No leaks were found and the pwd and the brakes seemed to
> >function properly, but the light was still on.  He then took the car to a
> >K-Mart repair shop (big mistake) they said he needed a new master cylinder
> >and returned the car to him with the brakes barely working at all (pedal
> >would hold only momentarily and then slowly go to the floor).
> 
> Sounds like a bad mc to me.  I've more then once had a brand new or brand new 
>rebuilt
> mc that was bad right out of the box.  That's part of the reason I bench 
>bleed the mc
> on a bench.
> 
> It is possible his original mc wasn't bad, but it's a stretch.  It's 
>theoretically
> possible for the rear brakes to be so far out of adjustment that the calipers 
>would
> build up enough pressure to move the pwd valve before the rear brakes engage.
> However, it's a stretch, and your friend would be complaining about a brake 
>pedal on
> the floor.
If this car truly has only 3K on it, in all proabality the seals in the
MC are shot. This car sat around with no use, which typical destroys
brake and fuel system seals faster than daily use! Things get stuck,
dryed out and rotten when they're not gettin used like they were
designed to.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>