Exactly! So adding it all up, just weighs more heavily on the conclusion
that putting a swing spring on an early spit in opposition to a camber
compensator is not an economically sound decision.
Thanks for that observation.
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: spitfires-bounces+spitlist=cox.net@autox.team.net
[mailto:spitfires-bounces+spitlist=cox.net@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Jim
Muller
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 7:09 PM
To: spitfires@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Spits] [TR] spit suspension question
On 9 Nov 2007 at 18:55, Joe Curry wrote:
> But the increase in the sway bar was an effort to compensate for
> the decrease in rear roll stiffness.
Which is exactly why I brought it up. It is yet one more necessary
thing that that fellow has to change if he wants to go to a swing-
spring. BL did it for a reason and so must everyone else too.
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Spitfires@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spitfires
http://www.team.net/archive
|