Kevin,
Im pretty sure on this, maybe some others can back me up, the 1296 is the one to
rebuild.
The 1500 is the worse of the 2 engines, being more prone to bottom end problems,
and the 1300 is considered the more peppy.
The 1300 engine from the Mk3 is considered the best of all the Spit engines.
James
Kevin Rhodes wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am looking for some reasoned advice. I need to rebuild one of my Spitfire
> engines. I have a 69 1296 or a 74 1500. The 1296 started making nasty
> noises with no loss of oil pressure, my mechanic thinks it is a bad little
> end bearing. It has been rebuilt at least once in the past. The 1500 has
> low compression in one cylinder, probably a rusted bore from standing for 5
> years, but is otherwise original as far as I know.
>
> So one or the other needs to be rebuilt, but which one? General opinion
> seems to be that the 1296 is the better engine overall, but I can't help
> but think that the 1500 might be more relaxed to drive - similar HP, but
> more torque at lower rpm. In either case it will have a pair of SU HS2's,
> and I would bump up the compression of the 1500 a bit. The car has
> overdrive, and I only drive it 3k a year or so, so I don't think longevity
> will be a real issue. I don't want a racecar, I have a 69 Saab Sonett for
> when I want to play hooligan... :-)
>
> Opinions wanted!
>
> Kevin Rhodes
> Westbrook, Maine
> Freddy the wounded Spitfire
/// spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list
/// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive
|