The attributes of Polyurethane that cause it to be stiffer are also what makes
it desirable in certain circumstances. These circumstances are mainly
concerned with performance. Firmer suspension components make for much more
precise handling.
For street use, the mechanic is probably right to recommend the rubber bits
rather than polyurethane.
Joe
P.S. I'd have to see the rack to make a decision on its condition.
BrYarboro@aol.com wrote:
>
> Hello all;
> As I mentioned last week, I've got to rebuild the front and rear suspensions.
> The mechanic, who appears to know LBC's, says there's no advantage to using
> polyurethane over rubber, except it makes for a stiffer, ie less comfortable,
> ride.
> I'd like to hear your opinions, esp. those folks who've made the switch.
> There's not that much difference in price, so which should I do?
> I have always prefered handling over smooth ride, but I don't really know
> what the car feels like with good rubber, and can't properly judge whether
> there'd be any improvement. My gut says poly. What do you say?
> Also, he tells my the rack on the '68 is NG, loose inner tie rods, worn out
> bushings, etc, I've got the rack from the '70, but I'm not confident of my
> ability to judge the parts car's rack's condition. Advice?
> TIA;
> Brian
> '68 Mk 3.
> '70 Mk 3 organ donor
///
/// spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list
/// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
/// with nothing in it but
///
/// unsubscribe spitfires
///
///
|