healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: scuttle 'shake, rattle and roll'

To: healeys@autox.team.net, j.aeckerlin@tiscali.nl
Subject: Re: scuttle 'shake, rattle and roll'
From: "R. Cobb" <rcobb@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 16:23:25 -0600
Jack,

As to dynamic balancing on the car, I found this reference: "Automotive 
Suspension, Steering and Brakes", by Ellinger and Hathaway, printed 
sometime in the 70's or so.  

According to them (after static balance is completed, using the same 
instrument), "Dynamic balance may be checked and corrected on the 
vehicle.  The strobe type balance...is used.  For dynamic balance the 
vibration sensor is positioned against the steering arm or brake splash 
shield... In this position it will detect any tendency for the wheel to 
turn in or out.  The reference mark is again used as it ws for the 
static balance.  For dynamic balance, one weight is added inside the 
front of the wheel at the sensor height and one weight is added 180 
degrees from the sensor at the rear of the wheel on the outside.  In 
dynamic balance, equal-sized weights are always used to maintain static 
balance."

I have an old Alemite wheel balancer that can be used as described 
above, but the main problem I have had is with the sensitivity of the 
sensor which controls the strobe.  It has proven too sensitive and is 
non-adjustable.  Consequently, though I have been able to improve the 
static and dynamic balance of the tire/wheel/brake assembly the result 
is not as good as I would like.  I would think that with an improved 
sensing device, and a bit of practice, good results might be achieved.

This type of wheel balancer has all but disappeared in the U.S., with 
the introduction of computerized, off-the vehicle, balancers, but I know 
that it used to be used extensively in the 40's through 60's.

R. Cobb



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 267.14.25 - Release Date: 1/30/06




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>