datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Why #3?

To: datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Why #3?
From: Jim Tyler <toplessdatsun@ga.prestige.net>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 00:04:44 -0400
Thanks for posting those Gordon.  Haven't seen those in a LONG time.
Note the first paragraph.. sustained revs over 6000.  For that type use the
U20 can use a little help.  The stock U20 is still a VAST improvement over 
the stock R16.

Jim



Gordon Glasgow wrote:
> 
> Somebody at Nissan thought the U20 still had an oiling problem. Check out the 
>following scans I just
> did of a Datsun Racing News bulletin detailing a change to the oil passages 
>on the U20:
> http://www.gordon-glasgow.org/Images/U20_Oil_Mod1.gif
> http://www.gordon-glasgow.org/Images/U20_Oil_Mod2.gif
> http://www.gordon-glasgow.org/Images/U20_Oil_Mod3.gif
> 
> Sorry I didn't have time to do a nice clean job on this. I simply scanned the 
>pages. The pictures
> weren't much help, anyway, since all I was working from was a photocopy.
> 
> Another thought on all the piston failures - did you guys make sure you put 
>the rods in with the
> little oil hole pointing towards the distributor side of the block? That oil 
>hole lubricates and
> cools the piston on that side. The other side gets plenty of splash 
>lubrication. I noticed that the
> hole in Victor's piston was on the distributor side.
> 
> Jim Tyler wrote:
> 
> > Don't lump the number 2 or 3 rod bearing failures from the r-16 (GP) into 
>the
> > U20.
> > The U20 doesn't have any inherent cylinder faults like the 1600.
> > Those of us who have built a lot of modified R16 engines, know about the 2/3
> > problem.  It is inherent in the oiling system of both the 3 main, and
> > 5 main R16 designs.  With quite a bit of money and specific machine work it 
>can
> > be eliminated.    Nissan eliminated it for us in the U20 design.
> 
> --
> Gordon Glasgow
> http://www.gordon-glasgow.org

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>