Get the WRX wagon. Sure it's a tad heavier and has a marginally narrower
track than the sedan, but you can put all your tires in the back. Or your
mountain bikes when you're not autoxing. And it works out to ~$1k cheaper
because it's $500 less to start, and you don't need to add the wing to hide
the sedan's odd-looking concave trunk lid.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Chafin [mailto:bchafin@attglobal.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 11:58 AM
Cc: Vitaly Iourtchenko; Derek Butts; craig boyle;
ba-autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Seven Year Itch
I agree on all accounts. When faced with this kind of performance
value/aesthetic quandary I choose on the performance/value side and
order the car in Black ; ), which, tends to mute the style (?) lines.
Wow, an SCCA license with the purchase on a new car. Now that sure
sounds like a 4-Door Sports car to me... Hmmm, any thoughts on the
RX-8? Maybe it'll include a Street School too : ).
Barry - http://www.4d-sport.com
Vitaly Iourtchenko wrote:
> > I would say the WRX - It's alot of car for the $$$$.
> > We'll see what the IS 5 speed is like in August.
>
> It's a great car and all, but the WRX has a mug that only
> a mother would love :)
>
> Vitaly
> 87 CSP
|