autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Polyurethane Bushings on 92 Civic

To: autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Polyurethane Bushings on 92 Civic
From: PbPied@aol.com
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 00:38:11 EST
It was not posted, I don't think...  But it does depend on
what class the car is used for.  Stock: Sorry, go back to
the OEM bushings.  SP/STS/P/M/SM:  Poly works.

Alan


************************

> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:00:27 EST
> From: Smokerbros@aol.com
> Subject: Re: Polyurethane Bushings on 92 Civic
> 
> In a message dated 3/24/03 4:20:55 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
> civicr1992@yahoo.com writes:
> 
> 
> > I just discovered that my Compensator Arm has ripped bushing (rubber is 
> > ripped from the outside metal sleeve).  Would you recommend just 
> replacing 
> > Compensator Arm OR install Prothane (Co. name) bushings in those Arms?  
> Is 
> > it worth it? The Compensator Arms control rear toe, so would be the 
> > presence of stiff polyurethane be benefitiary?  
> 
> Those large bushings in the middle of the trailing arms are famous for 
> ripping out.  I'd go polyurethane.
> 
> > Also, for AutoXers, what rear toe-in setting do you recommend?  Manual 
> says 
> > 3 mm +2 mm / -1mm.   If you have more/less toe, how does it make the car 
> > feel?
> 
> Less toe-in in the rear will make that particular chassis more neutral, 
> until 
> it starts oversteering. If I remember correctly, 1/8" - 1/4" total toe-in 
> was 
> about right on an '88 CRX-Si, which might have been a bit more tailhappy 
> than 
> your car.  Have fun...
> 
> Charlie Davis

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>