autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?' Now: cats

To: autox mailing list <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?' Now: cats
From: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:43:38 -0500 (EST)
Howdy,

On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, kent rafferty wrote:
> I have two setups: a high flow cat and a no-cat
> straight pipe.  The performance difference isn't
> significant (for my car) and I can pass any emissions
> test with the high flow cat.  A cat rule would be
> easy to verify and if someone wants to cheat (by
> running a hollow cat), the performance gain won't
> be that significant  vs a high flow cat.  I don't like
> the idea of requiring factory cat(s) on a highly
> modified car though. It's not realistic.

Yes, in case it wasn't clear before, I'd say we should require a cat with
no limits on OEM vs. HP or whatever in SM.

Actually, that would apply to ST as well.

Mark

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>