Nope, can't do it. :^) Actually, I drove a Supra turbo around Harrisburg at
the 1994 Pro. Very fast off the line, and good handling, just a bit
overweight (like me). Unfortunately, I've been sort of using the Porsche
exclusion in conjunction with the Supras. Regretably, you own the victim of
of my focus. :^)
That being said, SM certainly has some noble goals, but it (IMO) skirts a
bigger issue of working most of SM participants into our existing
structure(s) without creating "I" or additional classes. (This also requires
*more* restructuring of existing classes)
The inference of P-cars being "rare and expensive" and therefore not
attainable by the common Honda owner, doesn't ring true. 944 Turbo are in
the
$7 to $14k and require a limited investment for performance mods.
Matt Murray
(I really have no dog in this, outside of being a P-car owner).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Kent Rafferty
To: autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: The Tao of SM Inclusion/Exclusion
Couldn't just let it die could you Matt? :-) I thought
I managed to make it through another wave of
suprabashing (tm) that started back in the "why is the
Supra in E/SP" days, but nooo. I knew I shoulda just
sold the Supra and bought an E/SP M3 -- wait, bad
idea....:-)
Kent Rafferty
AP, uh, SM Supra
> I couldn't help but notice the phrase "rare and/or
very expensive". The last generation Supra was both
rare and expensive. Did I
miss something?
> Matt Murray
|