Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rollcage\s+again\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rollcage\s+again\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. rollcage again (score: 1): Author: Phillip Landry <saltracer@netscape.net>; Date: 2 Feb 00 19:03:01 PST; Okay, we're buying some 1 5/8 diameter .134 wall seamless tubing for our rollcage. The extra wall thickness is to make sure the wall thickness does not go below spec when making a bend on the outsid; /html/land-speed/2000-02/msg00036.html (7,351 bytes)
2. Re: rollcage again (score: 1): Author: V4GR@aol.com; Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 10:53:34 EST; Phil; All you need is seamless mild steel, but why go with 1 5/8 dia. 1 3/4 can't be that much more and if you ever get fast enough or run in F class you will need 1 3/4. I know, I'm looking at major; /html/land-speed/2000-02/msg00041.html (7,542 bytes)
3. Re: rollcage again (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 12:01:03 -0500; I don't see anything in the rule book that says you need 1 3/4-inch tubeing for a roll cage, unless your running a roll bar. Some vehicles under 175 MPH can use a 1 1/2-inch cage, but like you said; /html/land-speed/2000-02/msg00045.html (8,304 bytes)
4. Re: rollcage again (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rapidnet.com>; Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2000 11:28:04 -0700; Ed, apparently I (Joe not Jon) was the only defensive Neon person, sorry did not mean to come across that way (I have the same trouble at home), your points are well taken, wish there were some Neons; /html/land-speed/2000-02/msg00048.html (7,817 bytes)
5. Re: rollcage again (score: 1): Author: "Lawrence E. & Cathy R. Mayfield" <lemay@hiwaay.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2000 01:40:28; Holey Smokes! Did the rule book change? I don't have the 2000 one but the '99 one under III-2.2 says 1 5/8 minimum wall 0.120. Says for classes G H I J K can use 1 1/2 x 0.095 wall. Classes whhich ex; /html/land-speed/2000-02/msg00050.html (8,321 bytes)
6. Re: rollcage again (score: 1): Author: Wester S Potter <wspotter@jps.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2000 13:06:35 -0700; You are safe with the '99 rules on diameter and thickness ... the only 2000 changes say; III-2 "All closed cars over 175 MPH and non-metallic bodied cars entered in classes with records or minimums; /html/land-speed/2000-02/msg00051.html (9,405 bytes)
7. Re: rollcage again (score: 1): Author: "Jim Dincau" <jdincau@qnet.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 12:16:35 -0800; Hi all; Note that there is a difference in the definitions of "roll bar" and "roll cage" in the rule book. "Roll bars" (figure 1) must be 1-3/4 dia. .120 wall. If you run classes G,H,I,J & K and the; /html/land-speed/2000-02/msg00052.html (9,672 bytes)
8. Fwd: rollcage again (score: 1): Author: V4GR@aol.com; Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 16:45:37 EST; --part1_fb.1bd6bb3.25cb5101_boundary Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: V4GR@aol.com From: V4GR@aol.com Full-name: V4GR Message-ID: <bc.eaa159.25cb50c9@aol.com> Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 16:44:41; /html/land-speed/2000-02/msg00053.html (7,896 bytes)
9. Re: rollcage again (score: 1): Author: V4GR@aol.com; Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 16:53:45 EST; See my posting. I don't know why I get harassed for having 1 5/8 tube. Fred Danzenfelzer had to write it in my log book that the cage was OK under 175. I don't have any idea why its being looked upon; /html/land-speed/2000-02/msg00054.html (7,450 bytes)
10. Re: rollcage again (score: 1): Author: V4GR@aol.com; Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 16:59:28 EST; Dan Warner; Is that a cage or roll bar in my roadster? Will my Vega require a cage in 2000? Now it has pretty much Fig 1 on page 22 of the 99 rule book Rich Fox; /html/land-speed/2000-02/msg00055.html (7,511 bytes)
11. Re: rollcage again (score: 1): Author: V4GR@aol.com; Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 18:54:49 EST; List; I now know what is wrong with my cage. Although the cage is 1 5/8 the double tube frame is 1 1/2. Since the cage is attached to the frame, it is considered 1 1/2 and limited to 175 mph. I am as; /html/land-speed/2000-02/msg00057.html (7,791 bytes)
12. Re: rollcage again (score: 1): Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 04:28:07 -0800; You didn't read far enough - Section III.2.2 address ROLLCAGES, in your application i.e. open car, Section III.2 - 2nd sentence you need to use a cage vrs. rollbar. I 3/4; /html/land-speed/2000-02/msg00060.html (9,175 bytes)
13. Re: rollcage again (score: 1): Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 04:34:32 -0800; I don't recall the exact bar configuration on your roadster so am unable to comment at this time. If the Vega is entered in a class where the existing record is in excess of 175 (160 at El Mirage &; /html/land-speed/2000-02/msg00061.html (8,004 bytes)
14. Re: rollcage again (score: 1): Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 08:00:51 -0800; Fig.1 is a roll bar. See reference in Section III.2.1 Roll Bars, last sentence. always; /html/land-speed/2000-02/msg00062.html (7,659 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]