Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Why\s+most\s+autocrossers\s+don\'t\s+want\s+their\s+sport\s+on\s+TV\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Why most autocrossers don't want their sport on TV (score: 1)
Author: jac73@daimlerchrysler.com
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:16:45 -0500
Ben, I'm running way behind on e-mail, being away from the 'puters over the holidays. (Oh, and you'll have to e-mail me at my home account, autojim@att.net, because DCX's mailbots blow anything from
/html/autox/2002-01/msg00013.html (14,868 bytes)

2. Re: Why most autocrossers don't want their sport on TV (score: 1)
Author: bthatch@juno.com
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 18:06:40 -0500
Not in the "traditional sense" that is true. I don't see that as a bad thing, necessarily. Different can sometimes be good. Don't compare Pros to Tours for this discussion. Why? Because what I'm prop
/html/autox/2002-01/msg00022.html (17,335 bytes)

3. RE: Why most autocrossers don't want their sport on TV (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:12:44 -0600
Nobody will pony up the cash if they won't get a good return on their investment. One word: Enron /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/m
/html/autox/2002-01/msg00024.html (7,984 bytes)

4. Re: Why most autocrossers don't want their sport on TV (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 21:18:14 -0500
And this comes from the guy who LIKES "Ship Shape TV." racing gets a entirely by I'm available! (And cheap, too!) Matt Murray mattm@optonline.net /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@
/html/autox/2002-01/msg00025.html (8,351 bytes)

5. Re: Why most autocrossers don't want their sport on TV (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:55:46 -0500 (EST)
I think a better market for you to propose such a thing to would be the various racing promotors, wouldn't it? They're used to advertising for spectators, providing food, finding event sponsors, etc
/html/autox/2002-01/msg00027.html (9,405 bytes)

6. Re: Why most autocrossers don't want their sport on TV (score: 1)
Author: jac73@daimlerchrysler.com
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:14:09 -0500
Hey! That's not entirely true. I said that I've actually watched it voluntarily. There is a difference. by The dream-team for this would be BobT, RichF, MattM making it happen behind the cameras/in t
/html/autox/2002-01/msg00048.html (9,819 bytes)

7. Re: Why most autocrossers don't want their sport on TV (score: 1)
Author: robertjfoley@compuserve.com
Date: 4 Jan 2002 12:48:16 -0800
We have the *personality* within our sport to -- Just think of the potential comedy hour/sitcom spin-offs possible from the crowd that hangs around Mike Snyder's Margarita Machine... ;^) Rob F. _____
/html/autox/2002-01/msg00050.html (8,396 bytes)

8. Re: Why most autocrossers don't want their sport on TV (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 17:05:55 -0500
Denial is the first symptom. :^) Matt Murray mattm@optonline.net watched it /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Par
/html/autox/2002-01/msg00054.html (8,220 bytes)

9. RE: Why most autocrossers don't want their sport on TV (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 17:17:21 -0600
Oh Sh#t, I think I've watch it with him. Yikes! e Denial is the first symptom. :^) Matt Murray mattm@optonline.net -- Original Message -- From: <jac73@daimlerchrysler.com> watched it /// unsubscribe/
/html/autox/2002-01/msg00055.html (9,065 bytes)

10. Why most autocrossers don't want their sport on TV (score: 1)
Author: bthatch@juno.com
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 22:59:14 -0500
Chris Eckles' response to GH typifies the majority opinion, I believe. Most autocrossers like their motorsports experience just the way it is. "Let's keep it secret except for those of us who already
/html/autox/2001-12/msg00407.html (16,508 bytes)

11. Re: Why most autocrossers don't want their sport on TV (score: 1)
Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 23:10:18 -0500
I got a better compromise.... Put Pro Solo on TV, and leave Solo II alone.... Mike /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/html/autox/2001-12/msg00408.html (8,747 bytes)

12. Re: Why most autocrossers don't want their sport on TV (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce Wentzel" <greendotracing@netzero.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 12:48:22 -0500
Interesting timing the discussion of TV coverage and autox insurance. Anybody else concerned that increased awareness of the sport would cause more insurance companies to write exclusion clauses? Bru
/html/autox/2001-12/msg00421.html (8,077 bytes)

13. Why most autocrossers don't want their sport on TV (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 11:53:39 -0600
It's abundantly evident that the requirements that would have to be met in order for our sport to get on TV - as articulated by those most in favor of this development - clearly result in something t
/html/autox/2001-12/msg00436.html (8,798 bytes)

14. Re: Why most autocrossers don't want their sport on TV (score: 1)
Author: KATNDADRACING@aol.com
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 20:31:33 EST
Maybe I missed the beginning of this thread, but didn't it start with the SCCA commercial on Speedvision? If great drivers started with autox then why not show that instead of some kind of a Formula
/html/autox/2001-12/msg00442.html (8,820 bytes)

15. Re: Why most autocrossers don't want their sport on TV (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 12:54:53 -0500
A :15 will go by too quickly, but a well done :30 will leave a better impression. This makes the most sense, all divisions of the Club could help defray the costs. Matt Murray mattm@optonline.net Cop
/html/autox/2001-12/msg00452.html (8,762 bytes)

16. RE: Why most autocrossers don't want their sport on TV (score: 1)
Author: "Stolz, Ken" <StolzK@mso.umt.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 13:24:03 -0700
I like "free" better. Why not Subaru produce a 30 second autocross spot? ~ Ken Stolz A :15 will go by too quickly, but a well done :30 will leave a better impression. This makes the most sense, all d
/html/autox/2001-12/msg00456.html (9,461 bytes)

17. Re: Why most autocrossers don't want their sport on TV (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 15:51:18 -0500
Free doesn't allow you to place the spot at the time and place that you as an advertiser might want. Like avoiding Luge, or Ship Shape TV. Matt Murray mattm@optonline.net Copyright 2001, Matthew D. M
/html/autox/2001-12/msg00457.html (8,207 bytes)

18. Re: Why most autocrossers don't want their sport on TV (score: 1)
Author: "Charles R. Schultz" <n2pua4@peoplepc.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 15:05:56 -0600
They're concentrating on 30-minute spots, like the WRC preview I saw the other day. /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/html/autox/2001-12/msg00458.html (8,708 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu