A couple of weeks ago a guy on here, he weant by the name of JH, asked what would be the ultimate BSP vette a C3, C4, or C5? Knowbody really answered him, except 4 somebody trying to sell Scotty's ca
Good summary, Adam. Wanted to add that major revisions were made to the C4 chassis in '88; the rear suspension geometry was reworked for a lower roll center, and the front for "zero scrub radius" (in
I have run my C4 ZR-1 with both the early and late front suspension geometries. The 88 and later zero scrup uses a longer lower control arm and has more camber gain which I believe to be an advantage
I was told by someone in the know that a key update part for a pre-88 C4 is to use the 88's lower control arm mounting brackets. These, I'm told, lower the mounting position of the arms to the rear e
In SS as much as you can get without squashing the frame rails. Works out to about 0.7 to 1 degree negative. With BSP and the car lowered about 1.5 degrees. More static negative hurts braking so ther
This lowers the inboard pick up points of the camber struts, lowers the roll center, and reduces camber gain during roll. I'm not convinced it's the hot setup for the later reason. -- Rick --Original
roll hot What do you suggest for REAR camber then? :) I've been running about -2.75 deg in back and -1 to -1.5 up front (unable to do any better without offset bushings, which will be in this weekend
So instead of buying the expensive offset LCA bushings, substituting an 88+ LCA into an 84-87 front suspension gets you the capability for more static negative and more camber gain? Bruce Wentzel Gre