Good summary, Adam. Wanted to add that major
revisions were made to the C4 chassis in '88; the rear
suspension geometry was reworked for a lower roll
center, and the front for "zero scrub radius" (in
practice, this was achieved by increasing king pin
inclination to something ugly like 15 degrees).
Which is faster in autox is probably an open question.
The new rear geometry produces less jacking and may
have greater cornering capability (on pre-'88s you can
watch the outside rear jack up in hard corners). I
have talked to SS folks who do not like the '88-up
front...they say the new geometry kills low-speed
turning response. In practice it does not seem to
have hurt Scotty White's car ('89?) :)
Has anyone ever tried _back_dating the front
suspension on a late C4?
Craig Blome (thought about BSP...then thought about
buying a house ;)
--- Adam Popp <raft321@fuse.net> wrote:
>
> But it seems the car 2 have 4 B/SP as we head into
> the millenium is the
> C4. A lot of B/SPer's r jumping into the C4's and
> transplanting the
> original motor with either a LT4, LT1, or L98. I
> autocross an '86 with
> an LT4, and it simply hauls ass. So I say go with
> the LT4 engine. U can
> go the easier route and buy a '96 vette with the LT4
> already in it, if u
> have that kind of dough.
Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com
|