Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rollbars\s+and\s+Weiners\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rollbars\s+and\s+Weiners\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Rollbars and Weiners (score: 1): Author: Bret Dodson <bret@serv.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 13:30:40 -0800 (PST); Okay, So I've been deleting Weenie Protest related posts like a madman for the past day and a half. But, all of this weiner talk has frightened me, a seasoned (half-baked) competitor. (NW list folks; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01423.html (7,828 bytes)
2. RE: Rollbars and Weiners (score: 1): Author: "Ayer, John K" <John.Ayer@PSS.Boeing.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 14:58:33 -0800; Well you'd think Common Sense has got to kick in eventually, to whit: "if it's allowed, then it's allowed to mount it". Almost as simple as "if the factory put it in, then that's where it goes". Butt; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01426.html (8,977 bytes)
3. Re: Rollbars and Weiners (score: 1): Author: Topper Jones <gbrt@rocketmail.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 17:35:48 -0800 (PST); On page 98 of last years Rule Book (1998) under Stock Category it states "Roll bars and roll cages may be added." It goes on to say a lot more but that's the main thing you needed to hear. I run a nu; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01439.html (8,394 bytes)
4. Re: Rollbars and Weiners (score: 1): Author: Josh Sirota <jss@marimba.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 17:43:49 -0800; I don't have my rulebook handy, so I may be sticking my foot in my mouth here. But it amazes me how simplistic an approach some people take to reading the rules. "Roll cages are legal" does not imply; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01440.html (8,447 bytes)
5. Re: Rollbars and Weiners (score: 1): Author: Topper Jones <gbrt@rocketmail.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 18:02:30 -0800 (PST); Josh, I couldn't agree more. Maybe I should have copied the several pages instead of just saying "It goes on to say a lot more...." I do believe that Bret's 4 point would be legal, but yes he should; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01442.html (9,489 bytes)
6. Re: Rollbars and Weiners (score: 1): Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 09:42:57 -0600; Check out Appendix C, as noted in the main rule. It spells out in very minute detail what is or is not allowed. -- Patrick Washburn <washburn@dwave.net> Wausau, WI Land of Cheese 95 DS Neon Moooooooo; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01449.html (7,902 bytes)
7. RE: Rollbars and Weiners (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 11:07:34 -0800; Of course, it also says that following Appendix C is "strongly recommended", which means "not required". KeS; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01454.html (7,689 bytes)
8. Re: Rollbars and Weiners (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 00:21:36 -0600; recommended", Where does it say that? Please review these sections and let me know if there has been any change for 1999: == 3.3.A: Seat Lap belts are required in all cars. Installation of shoulder b; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01469.html (8,820 bytes)
9. RE: Rollbars and Weiners (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 19:04:50 -0800; Hmm. I guess you're right, Phil. I was over in 13.2.G for Stock Class, where they refer you to Appendix C but don't mention it being required. Thanks! KeS "Roll bars may be added (See Appendix C). It; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01493.html (7,436 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]