Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+End\s+\(was\s+Re\[2\]\:\s+EFI\s+\/\s+custom\s+engine\)\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Rear End (was Re[2]: EFI / custom engine) (score: 1)
Author: Adam Bradley <ambradley@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:12:10 -0800 (PST)
About the different rear end, I've got a '70 1600 with 195/60/14 tires. I plan to replace these with 195/50/15, which is actually a fraction of an inch smaller in outer diameter than 195/60/14. It wa
/html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00269.html (12,120 bytes)

2. Re: Rear End (was Re[2]: EFI / custom engine) (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick P. Castronovo" <slick1@mohaveaz.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 19:34:53 -0800
before you go into the expense of changing your rear end, try dropping to a 13" tire, and you will see the difference using a higher geared rearend will feel like.(411) You will have a faster pickup,
/html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00275.html (13,497 bytes)

3. Re: Rear End (was Re[2]: EFI / custom engine) (score: 1)
Author: Adam Bradley <ambradley@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 19:11:40 -0800 (PST)
No, I want BIGGER rims, not smaller! But I could get some 13x10 positive offset gold wire wheels and some really small tires - cool! But seriously, is that a YES to changing the rear end to give me a
/html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00276.html (14,615 bytes)

4. Re: Rear End (was Re[2]: EFI / custom engine) (score: 1)
Author: Ronnie Day <ronday@home.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 21:59:42 -0600
If I remember correctly (the 1600 being 3.90/the 2000 being 3.70), and considering that the 1600 has less torque than the 2000 (all other things being correct) and the 1600 may not want to pull the
/html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00279.html (9,778 bytes)

5. Re: Rear End (was Re[2]: EFI / custom engine) (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick P. Castronovo" <slick1@mohaveaz.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 21:13:39 -0800
What I meant is if you wanted to see what you would in essence be doing, is to "TRY" using 2 rear wheels in the 13" rim and tires.(Corvair will fit) then you will see for yourself with smaller tires,
/html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00280.html (16,196 bytes)

6. Re: Rear End (was Re[2]: EFI / custom engine) (score: 1)
Author: CalSpeed@aol.com
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:45:04 EST
<< It was suggested to me that I might want to replace my 1600 rear end with a 2000 rear end, as the lower tires turn my 3.90 into more like a 4.11, reducing my top speed... >> If you are running wit
/html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00283.html (9,280 bytes)

7. Re: Rear End (was Re[2]: EFI / custom engine) (score: 1)
Author: Adam Bradley <ambradley@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 20:55:32 -0800 (PST)
You got my question backwards. By using smaller tires (which I already am), I am EFFECTIVELY raising the rear end ratio from the original 3.90 to near 4.11. I want to put in the 3.70 rear end, which
/html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00285.html (17,675 bytes)

8. Re: Rear End (was Re[2]: EFI / custom engine) (score: 1)
Author: Adam Bradley <ambradley@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 21:06:41 -0800 (PST)
Thanks for the answer. It runs pretty well at freeway speeds now with its shorter tires and stock rear end, but I just wanted to find out if leaving the rear end alone was the best choice. Get person
/html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00286.html (10,154 bytes)

9. Re: Rear End (was Re[2]: EFI / custom engine) (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick P. Castronovo" <slick1@mohaveaz.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 07:32:58 -0800
You're right.
/html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00293.html (18,933 bytes)

10. Re: Rear End (was Re[2]: EFI / custom engine) (score: 1)
Author: "Victor Laury" <vlaury@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:32:04 -0800
I have a spreadsheet called Transcalc.xls that does these calculations. Just plug in your tire size, rear ratio and transmission. Then you can mix and match to your heart desire. I can't take credit
/html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00298.html (8,817 bytes)

11. RE: Rear End (was Re[2]: EFI / custom engine) (score: 1)
Author: "Gordon Glasgow" <glasgow@serv.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 21:14:11 -0800
Thank you, Victor. That was me. But the one on the Web (http://www.geocities.com/z_design_studio/) is better than mine. The only advantage to mine is that you can save the results offline. Gordon Gla
/html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00404.html (9,499 bytes)

12. Re: Rear End (was Re[2]: EFI / custom engine) (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick P. Castronovo" <slick1@mohaveaz.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 09:36:55 -0800
I would like to save one to disk, I tried the one on the web but no luck. Just how
/html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00416.html (10,071 bytes)

13. Re: Rear End (was Re[2]: EFI / custom engine) (score: 1)
Author: Eddie <datsunroadsters@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:44:39 -0800 (PST)
I've uploaded the .xls file to my Yahoo! Briefcase. Try using this link to access it. You should be able to download this to your local media. http://y42.briefcase.yahoo.com/bc/datsunroadsters/lst?.d
/html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00421.html (11,039 bytes)

14. Re: Rear End (was Re[2]: EFI / custom engine) (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick P. Castronovo" <slick1@mohaveaz.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 13:02:45 -0800
When I click the URL I get to the Document Page, but when I click the Trans Converter the next page is all letters. Nothing else. Pat --Original Message-- From: Eddie <datsunroadsters@yahoo.com> To:
/html/datsun-roadsters/2001-02/msg00423.html (11,543 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu