Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Peru\s+Pro\s+\(a\s+bit\s+long\)\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Peru Pro (a bit long) (score: 1)
Author: "Steven N. Burkett" <sburkett@ooi.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 13:56:47 -0500 (CDT)
For whatever reason, most of the close calls were on Sunday, *after* the actual collision. I think that there were three factors: 1) By Sunday, everyone knew that the box was full-throttle. 2) The dr
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00289.html (9,993 bytes)

2. Re: Peru Pro (a bit long) (score: 1)
Author: "Steven T. Ekstrand" <cyberlaw@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 12:50:53 -0700
[Weenie mode back on] That makes it worse! Sometimes it is hard to recognize a close call until there is an incident, but once there is an incident??? I understand the reluctance to change course, b
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00296.html (8,197 bytes)

3. Re: Peru Pro (a bit long) (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 22:12:48 -0400 (EDT)
And thereby either invalidate Saturday's runs or make it nearly impossible to improve them? I woulda been happy with the first choice but certainly not the second... It is. Neither driver was hurt.
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00327.html (9,004 bytes)

4. Re: Peru Pro (a bit long) (score: 1)
Author: Erik Van-der-Mey <autox@webcentrix.net>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 22:04:33 -0500
The Monday morning armchair quarterbacking is in full swing!! Unless you were at the event, you really have no right to impose your views/opinions on those who were. Some driver mistakes were made,
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00334.html (9,698 bytes)

5. Re: Peru Pro (a bit long) (score: 1)
Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 22:29:25 -0500
Now the real truth comes out! Why don't you just pull a Tanya Harding on everyone? PLW
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00337.html (8,069 bytes)

6. Re: Peru Pro (a bit long) (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 00:55:05 -0500
Some driver mistakes were made, == I fully expect to get flamed for this, so go to it guys. Coming from a SSS viewpoint, the above attitude is TOTAL BULLSHIT and against the rules. Changing a course
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00346.html (9,543 bytes)

7. Re: Peru Pro (a bit long) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Ourand <sojim@home.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 23:42:43 -0700
I suggest DECAF. I/we "race" cars (call it anything you want) and incidents can happen. Have you ever chaired a high level event (tour, pro, divisional)? You just don't change the course, especially
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00348.html (11,131 bytes)

8. Re: Peru Pro (a bit long) (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Pozner" <apozner@ptd.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 08:27:40 -0400
For once Linnhoff and I agree 100%. Regards, Alan to
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00353.html (10,262 bytes)

9. Re: Peru Pro (a bit long) (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 09:03:54 -0400 (EDT)
That brings up the positive side of the courses coming back together... The chance to see your competitor and out-brake him going into the turn around... :-) Mark (haven't done _that_ for a while...
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00354.html (8,344 bytes)

10. Re: Peru Pro (a bit long) (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 09:13:46 -0400 (EDT)
Please define "unsafe". Nobody got hurt. If we wanna start getting all nasty about it (and its interesting that I haven't heard _one_ of the 200+ people who were there say it shoulda been stopped. G
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00355.html (9,206 bytes)

11. Re: Peru Pro (a bit long) (score: 1)
Author: Adam Popp <raft321@fuse.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 12:14:26 -0400
And now you should be flamed. Ok lets see, there were nearly 220 competitors at this years Peru Pro Solo event. A pro solo format is best suited for 160 to 180 competitors and Saturday competition la
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00372.html (12,134 bytes)

12. Re: Peru Pro (a bit long) (score: 1)
Author: Jkinser77@aol.com
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 12:33:54 EDT
Just to rewind to many years ago at the Harrisburg Pro solo when a man by the name of George Bowland in AM, ran over to the other side of the courses to say Hi during competition runs...these courses
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00376.html (8,102 bytes)

13. Re: Peru Pro (a bit long) (score: 1)
Author: Steven Burkett <sburkett@ooi.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 14:54:02 -0700
For what it's worth, I was on corner 1, and one of the first one to reach the scene. At any rate, the driver of the blue neon took 100% responsibility. Didn't blame the course, or anyone else. Also,
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00386.html (8,286 bytes)

14. Re: Peru Pro (a bit long) (score: 1)
Author: Adam Popp <raft321@fuse.net>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 11:38:41 -0400
What do you think it means?It means that this was the biggest pro solo of the season and the competition lasted all day. Ask anybody else that goes to a lot of pro solos and they will tell you that t
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00438.html (12,673 bytes)

15. Re: Peru Pro (a bit long) (score: 1)
Author: Randy Chase <randyc2@home.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 09:15:51 -0700
-SNIP- Disagree. It does not require serious injury to look at the situation and see if something needed to be changed. There is some other consideration in a Pro Format, because of how you will end
/html/autox/2000-05/msg00443.html (10,456 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu