- 1. M3 in F-stock (score: 1)
- Author: "Dunlap, Peter" <Peter.Dunlap@Surgient.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 18:37:21 -0500
- Perhaps this is the first step on his road to an F-stock national championship: September 2003 -- After two years of development Bob's E46 M3 finishes 2nd in SS at Nationals, losing to a Z06 Corvette
- /html/autox/2000-10/msg01105.html (12,546 bytes)
- 2. Re: M3 in F-stock (score: 1)
- Author: Todd Green <tag@cs.utah.edu>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:12:33 -0600
- Nice story Peter. Please allow me to interject some facts in lieu of your fabricated numbers. In 1998 Bob only managed 10th and was 2.754 out of first. In 1999 Bob only managed 11th and was 1.423 out
- /html/autox/2000-10/msg01119.html (9,819 bytes)
- 3. RE: M3 in F-stock (score: 1)
- Author: "Dunlap, Peter" <Peter.Dunlap@Surgient.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:16:53 -0600
- You're right. I should have looked these up. To make the story hang together better, let's say the M3 was using Hoosier tires while it was in SS. :-) OK, for the rest of the story -- if all the time
- /html/autox/2000-10/msg01186.html (10,089 bytes)
- 4. RE: M3 in F-stock (score: 1)
- Author: Ron Katona <rkatona@bellatlantic.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 00:07:07 -0500
- Hmm... E46 M3: 333 hp, 3450 lb, front engine, RWD, big brakes/wheels/tires Camarobird: 320 hp, 3550 lb, front engine, RWD, big brakes/wheels/tires -) <-- not a straight face One thing to realize with
- /html/autox/2000-10/msg01230.html (10,351 bytes)
- 5. Re: M3 in F-stock (score: 1)
- Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 01:08:59 -0500
- When I see the E46 show up with a big ol' honkin' solid axle under there, THEN I'll agree that it goes in ESP. Between that and it's weight balance, it may as well be a Corvette.... After all: Corve
- /html/autox/2000-10/msg01232.html (7,806 bytes)
- 6. RE: M3 in F-stock (score: 1)
- Author: David A Teague <David.Teague@wcom.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 01:16:56 -0500
- Well if thats the case then the 99-up mustangs should be moved they have When I see the E46 show up with a big ol' honkin' solid axle under there, THEN I'll agree that it goes in ESP. Between that an
- /html/autox/2000-10/msg01233.html (8,115 bytes)
- 7. RE: M3 in F-stock (score: 1)
- Author: Karl Witt <witt@mediaone.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 01:52:29 -0500
- At 01:16 AM 10/31/2000 -0500, David A Teague did say: Not a good one :)
- /html/autox/2000-10/msg01234.html (7,958 bytes)
- 8. Re: M3 in F-stock (score: 1)
- Author: Rex Tener <rex_tener@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:47:02 -0800
- Do C5's really weigh 3450 lbs? The Chevy web site lists the Z06 at 3130 lbs and the heaviest 'Vette (Coupe) at 3212 lbs. -- Rex Tener rex_tener@yahoo.com 1995 BMW M3, SCCA SFR Solo II A-Stock #173 __
- /html/autox/2000-10/msg01235.html (7,887 bytes)
- 9. Re: M3 in F-stock (score: 1)
- Author: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 06:03:09 -0500
- The 2001 M3 (E46) also has only 265 in torque. So side by side: Z06 Vette (is there any other?) 385 Hp, 385 Trq, 3130 lbs E46 M3 (if they'll ever be shipped, motor problems rumors) 333 Hp, 262 Trq, 3
- /html/autox/2000-10/msg01239.html (8,274 bytes)
- 10. Re: M3 in F-stock (score: 1)
- Author: Brian M Kennedy <kennedy@i2.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 05:19:20 -0600
- Yep, the new M3 is not competitive with the Z06 Vette. Way too heavy. The Z8 would be more competitive with the Z06... but of course, the Z8 was bumped right out of Stock (just as the M3 LTW was). Ch
- /html/autox/2000-10/msg01241.html (8,304 bytes)
- 11. RE: M3 in F-stock (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Lloyd" <Jeff@cyberconceptz.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 15:15:25 -0500
- Do not forget the "secret" 1.4 Multiplication factor all BMW's Receive when being classed in S.C.C.A. So that's really 367lbs/ft Jeff The 2001 M3 (E46) also has only 265 in torque. So side by side: Z
- /html/autox/2000-10/msg01274.html (8,701 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu