Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*General\s+Turbo\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*General\s+Turbo\s+question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: General Turbo question (score: 1): Author: Paul McGovern <pm@nyisles.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 03:41:44 -0400 (EDT); Plain and simple, lower compression will be more resistant to detonation. Detonation is possibly the biggest enemy of any engine (turbo or otherwise), and it can kill the motor in short order if not; /html/autox/2002-07/msg00001.html (7,849 bytes)
2. Re: General Turbo question (score: 1): Author: SpedToe169@aol.com; Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 09:48:20 -0400; If I'm not mistaken, another difference between the low CR high boost and higher CR lower boost is how the engine feels off of boost. The lower CR high boost engine may feel sluggish and take longer; /html/autox/2002-07/msg00002.html (6,883 bytes)
3. RE: General Turbo question (score: 1): Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>; Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 09:07:37 -0500; So, ultimately, from the on and off list replies I've received, it seems that for a street driven car the high CR/low boost option is a better choice for driveability. As is the case with most afterm; /html/autox/2002-07/msg00003.html (7,517 bytes)
4. General Turbo question (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 23:10:55 -0500; Here's a general turbo question to discuss. What's the difference between taking a stock NA compression ratio engine (say, from 9 to 10:1) and putting 7-12 psi of boost into it versus building a 8:1; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00587.html (6,554 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]