Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Different\s+Fenders\s+for\s+Armstrong\s+vs\s+Girling\s+Shocks\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Different\s+Fenders\s+for\s+Armstrong\s+vs\s+Girling\s+Shocks\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Different Fenders for Armstrong vs Girling Shocks? (score: 1): Author: William T Snyder <wtsnyder@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 10:21:31 -0400; After inquiring about re builders for TD shocks, one of the list members, Dallas Congleton, suggested that he remembered that the front fender design was different for TD's equipped with Girling vs A; /html/mg-t/2004-05/msg00026.html (7,709 bytes)
2. Re: Different Fenders for Armstrong vs Girling Shocks? (score: 1): Author: Dave & Liz DuBois <ddubois@sinclair.net>; Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 09:46:12 -0700; Dallas is correct, there is a hump required on the front fenders required to accomodate the Armstrong shocks, but you might want to check your fenders as compared to those on earliers TDs as they ma; /html/mg-t/2004-05/msg00027.html (7,480 bytes)
3. Re: Different Fenders for Armstrong vs Girling Shocks? (score: 1): Author: Bob Howard <mgbob@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 13:02:03 -0400; The parts book shows Girlings being the "Damper complete front" , part E136023, and the "Alternative Armstrong Shock Absorbers" part 500533, but does not (unlike other changes) show the starting cha; /html/mg-t/2004-05/msg00029.html (9,499 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]