Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Battery\s+Storage\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Battery\s+Storage\s*$/: 45 ]

Total 45 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Battery storage (score: 1): Author: LSAPEX@aol.com; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:30:59 EST; Haven't been following the thread closely, came across this the other day. Sorry if it's been mentioned. _http://www.improvementscatalog.com/Parent.asp?product=201584x&dept%5Fid=1_ (http://www.improv; /html/shop-talk/2005-12/msg00002.html (7,835 bytes)
2. Re: Battery storage (score: 1): Author: Paul Parkanzky <parkanz1@msu.edu>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 09:51:50 -0500; Right, but this is not a problem anymore because the mail server does not resend a message unless the footer is edited. ~Paul; /html/shop-talk/2005-12/msg00003.html (9,512 bytes)
3. RE: Battery storage (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 07:43:12 -0800; But the automatice reply programs generally do NOT send the original message back, so the footer would not be present. The automatic reply I got yesterday didn't even have the same subject line. Ran; /html/shop-talk/2005-12/msg00005.html (7,628 bytes)
4. Re: Battery storage (score: 1): Author: "Mark Andy" <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:44:27 -0500 (EST); Most all mail readers / servers / whatever pay attention to the "bulk mail" header (or whatever its called) and don't send the auto reply in that instance. I'm on numerous mail lists. Many set the r; /html/shop-talk/2005-12/msg00006.html (8,249 bytes)
5. RE: Battery storage (score: 1): Author: "Mullen, Tim $IIS$" <Tim.Mullen@ngc.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:04:35 -0500; I've never noticed. I'm just in the habit of "Reply All", so that everyone on the conversation gets the response. I also look at the list and delete the ones that shouldn't get the response, of just; /html/shop-talk/2005-12/msg00007.html (8,054 bytes)
6. Re: Battery storage (score: 1): Author: Steven Trovato <strovato@optonline.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 13:48:32 -0500; The inadequacy of products like this is what made me ask the question in the first place. They just don't have enough capacity. 6 D cells and 8 C cells is just not enough. Of course, they put a zilli; /html/shop-talk/2005-12/msg00010.html (8,448 bytes)
7. Re: Battery storage (score: 1): Author: LSAPEX@aol.com; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:59:14 EST; Buy 2 or 3 :) The inadequacy of products like this is what made me ask the question in the first place. They just don't have enough capacity. 6 D cells and 8 C cells is just not enough. Of course, th; /html/shop-talk/2005-12/msg00011.html (7,917 bytes)
8. Re: Battery storage (score: 1): Author: Rush <jdrush@enter.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 01:56:51 -0500; My goodness! Are we living in the 1992 era of mailing list software? I'm on 25 other mailing lists and yours are the only ones set for reply to sender. All the others seem to have figured out how to; /html/shop-talk/2005-12/msg00018.html (8,474 bytes)
9. Re: Battery storage (score: 1): Author: Rush <jdrush@enter.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 02:05:33 -0500; My solution was made of plywood and hardboard and ended up configured pretty much like this, <http://www.improvementscatalog.com/HanoverAssets/Improvements/large_images/208295zz.jpg> without the lid.; /html/shop-talk/2005-12/msg00019.html (8,721 bytes)
10. Re: Battery storage (score: 1): Author: David Scheidt <dmscheidt@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 02:14:22 -0500; All populated by people who can't quote properly? -- David Scheidt dmscheidt@gmail.com; /html/shop-talk/2005-12/msg00020.html (8,061 bytes)
11. Re: Battery storage (score: 1): Author: "Karl Vacek" <KVacek@Ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 16:07:40 -0600; OK - looks like everybody's going to let this slide, but I can't..... There's no need to rag on Mark Bradakis about his mailing-list software - remember this is HIS football and he lets us play with; /html/shop-talk/2005-12/msg00022.html (8,425 bytes)
12. RE: Battery storage (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:54:13 -0800; Thank you, Karl ! And all of you who think you could do it better, feel free to run off and build your own. Add all the bling you want, make it sing and dance. Then still be doing it 16 years later,; /html/shop-talk/2005-12/msg00023.html (8,112 bytes)
13. Re: Battery storage (score: 1): Author: "TONY CLARK" <lotus.tony@airmail.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 17:17:34 -0600; Good idea Karl . . . This "donate" site makes it easy and painless: http://www.team.net/donate.html Credit card or PayPal is easily accessed . . I just sent a modest "appreciation donation" and I fee; /html/shop-talk/2005-12/msg00024.html (8,441 bytes)
14. RE: Battery storage (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 22:26:56 -0500 (EST); I think there's a pretty big difference between "ragging on Mark B." and pointing out that other mailing lists seem to be able to handle "reply to list". I've been on a few Mark B. lists over the ye; /html/shop-talk/2005-12/msg00027.html (8,709 bytes)
15. Re: Battery storage (score: 1): Author: Rush <jdrush@enter.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 23:47:06 -0500; Am I going to get compared to Hitler next? Jon; /html/shop-talk/2005-12/msg00028.html (7,874 bytes)
16. Re: Battery storage (score: 1): Author: Rush <jdrush@enter.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 23:52:35 -0500; If you think that is ragging, you haven't seen ragging. I love this little community that Mark has built up with Shop Talk and some of the other lists. I wish Team.Net was comparable to its heyday in; /html/shop-talk/2005-12/msg00029.html (8,081 bytes)
17. Re: Battery storage (score: 1): Author: Rush <jdrush@enter.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 23:57:22 -0500; I run, or moderate 7 mailing lists and a forum. KISS is the approach on all of them. Don't be so fast to make judgment of my motivations or my determination. Jon; /html/shop-talk/2005-12/msg00030.html (7,654 bytes)
18. Battery storage (score: 1): Author: Steven Trovato <strovato@optonline.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:10:10 -0500; shop-talk supported in part by Fat Chance Garage http://fatchancegarage.com Has anyone come up with a clever way to store batteries? I'm talking about the usual D, C, AA, etc cells. I've seen these d; /html/shop-talk/2005-11/msg00131.html (7,746 bytes)
19. Re: Battery storage (score: 1): Author: Steven Trovato <strovato@optonline.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 18:15:42 -0500; shop-talk supported in part by Fat Chance Garage http://fatchancegarage.com Well, so far I've received two direct responses. First, my rant of the day. Come on guys. Let's respond to the list. Don't; /html/shop-talk/2005-11/msg00132.html (8,993 bytes)
20. Re: Battery storage (score: 1): Author: "Patricia Lane" <lane495@mwsi.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 17:58:08 -0600; shop-talk supported in part by Fat Chance Garage http://fatchancegarage.com -- I'm a gal, can I still respond? ;o) I have three of those 18-drawer units (roughly 14"w x 18"t x 7"d) hanging in my laun; /html/shop-talk/2005-11/msg00133.html (8,398 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]