Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Back\s+to\s+8\s+Run\s+Groups\,\s+and\s+what\s+it\s+means\s+for\s+SFR\s+2006\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 (score: 1)
Author: "james creasy" <james@thevenom.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 00:02:24 -0800
* 21 course workers (7 stations, with a flagger, radio and ONE cone chaser per station...consider this the MINIMUM per station to SAFELY do the job) i was thinking how this perception of requiring th
/html/ba-autox/2006-03/msg00000.html (11,147 bytes)

2. RE: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 (score: 1)
Author: "Runnion, Ed" <Ed_Runnion@regionofdoom.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 01:48:55 -0800
We had these positions before the sheet was redesigned... FWIW, there are 8 station signs. We occasionally put out all 8, usually only 7 or sometimes 6 for our shorter courses. As we are designing o
/html/ba-autox/2006-03/msg00001.html (11,551 bytes)

3. Re: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 (score: 1)
Author: Anthony Tabacco <tony@atarchitects.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 08:53:11 -0800
Most ironically, I originally made the 8th station sign only because it fit on the amount of particle board sheets we had bought. Grid A,B,2-2 driver, 8 stations-and the math was easier at the for ha
/html/ba-autox/2006-03/msg00002.html (9,334 bytes)

4. Re: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 (score: 1)
Author: Glenn Ellingson <geewiz@sonic.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 07:21:13 -0800
I am very happy to hear about the 8 run groups returning -- some of work assignments on 6 groups were loooong! I don't want to step into the argument over how many course workers are required per sta
/html/ba-autox/2006-03/msg00003.html (9,772 bytes)

5. Re: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 (score: 1)
Author: MWood24020@aol.com
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 12:19:08 EST
Since I think everyone agrees that we should not have all newbies at a station could we modify the signup sheet to make the first column of the course work assignment read "station captain" and put a
/html/ba-autox/2006-03/msg00004.html (9,397 bytes)

6. Re: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 (score: 1)
Author: james creasy <jcreasy@perforce.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 09:49:02 -0800
my original redesign of the sign up sheets specified one experienced worker per station. (this was not specified before and was the case in the ggf incident.) novices are always at risk to stand in
/html/ba-autox/2006-03/msg00007.html (9,990 bytes)

7. RE: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 (score: 1)
Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 10:14:07 -0800
* 21 course workers (7 stations, with a flagger, radio and ONE cone chaser per station...consider this the MINIMUM per station to SAFELY do the job) I beg to differ. I think three workers per station
/html/ba-autox/2006-03/msg00008.html (9,494 bytes)

8. RE: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 (score: 1)
Author: Katie Kelly <aceontour@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 11:06:09 -0800 (PST)
All this makes me long for the old days. I mean, the really old days. We didn't have radios or work stations. We all just scattered ourselves around the course, running after hit pylons and then hois
/html/ba-autox/2006-03/msg00009.html (9,302 bytes)

9. Re: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 (score: 1)
Author: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@harlie.idsfa.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 11:10:50 -0800
James, I agree that it can be done. It has been done. However, if you're only going to have two people at a station, one should be the runner and the other should have the flag & radio. Here's why: 1
/html/ba-autox/2006-03/msg00010.html (10,138 bytes)

10. RE: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 (score: 1)
Author: "Runnion, Ed" <Ed_Runnion@regionofdoom.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 11:22:25 -0800
Maybe my point got lost a bit, I'll clarify... The whole goal is to make the work groups as short as possible for the most possible people. I think we can all agree that is a worthwhile goal, and le
/html/ba-autox/2006-03/msg00012.html (11,983 bytes)

11. RE: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 (score: 1)
Author: Jim Ochi <jim_ochi@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 11:42:54 -0800
I agree with Scot - two people per station is perfectly adequate most of the time. Of course, there are always the situations where the station is a hot-spot of conage, and two people are just overwh
/html/ba-autox/2006-03/msg00013.html (10,465 bytes)

12. Re: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 (score: 1)
Author: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@harlie.idsfa.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 12:14:33 -0800
Katie, I was just thinking that the system so well-tuned that people get upset about relatively minor inconveniences. People complain about glitches, not realizing that there are other clubs where it
/html/ba-autox/2006-03/msg00014.html (10,307 bytes)

13. Re: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Stevens <autox@pursued-with.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 12:33:59 -0800 (PST)
So Tony, you're saying that we could solve the worker shortage with a simple slosh of gasoline and a match? ;) KeS
/html/ba-autox/2006-03/msg00015.html (9,292 bytes)

14. Re: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 (score: 1)
Author: 4D Sport <barry.chafin@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 12:56:02 -0800 (PST)
the sacrifice might also be good to build karma for the Club, don't you think b So Tony, you're saying that we could solve the worker shortage with a simple slosh of gasoline and a match? ;) KeS
/html/ba-autox/2006-03/msg00016.html (9,369 bytes)

15. RE: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 (score: 1)
Author: Katie Kelly <aceontour@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 12:59:58 -0800 (PST)
This is an ideal, just as an 8 run group situation is an ideal. It fails to take into account the number of people who choose to work and run earlier in the day. I think it would have been better to
/html/ba-autox/2006-03/msg00017.html (9,192 bytes)

16. Re: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 (score: 1)
Author: Anthony Tabacco <tony@atarchitects.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 13:05:39 -0800
Kevin, way to go; thats thinking outside the box. One station. We'll get some young folks and really abuse 'em. tony
/html/ba-autox/2006-03/msg00018.html (9,104 bytes)

17. Re: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 (score: 1)
Author: james creasy <jcreasy@perforce.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 13:29:37 -0800
its easier to combine 8 groups into 6 than to expand 6 into 8. james OSP - Operational Speedometers, Pah!
/html/ba-autox/2006-03/msg00019.html (9,291 bytes)

18. Re: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 (score: 1)
Author: Craig Wright <craigw@onehitninja.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 14:02:19 -0800
Tim Dolan forwarded me that guide before Round 2. It was extremely useful for getting into the correct mindset for running the event, especially as I am still relatively green to the AutoX scene. Pe
/html/ba-autox/2006-03/msg00020.html (8,719 bytes)

19. Re: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 (score: 1)
Author: Katie Kelly <aceontour@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:30:05 -0800 (PST)
-- "John J. Stimson-III" <john@harlie.idsfa.net> It should be But this requires that people read. -Katie
/html/ba-autox/2006-03/msg00021.html (8,270 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu