To: | "'Runnion, Ed'" <Ed_Runnion@regionofdoom.com>, <ba-autox@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006 |
From: | "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Wed, 1 Mar 2006 10:14:07 -0800 |
-----Original Message----- From: owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Runnion, Ed Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 10:39 PM To: 'ba-autox@autox.team.net' Cc: 'solo2sc@sfrscca.org' * 21 course workers (7 stations, with a flagger, radio and ONE cone chaser per station...consider this the MINIMUM per station to SAFELY do the job) I beg to differ. I think three workers per station is more the IDEAL number of course workers (duties as you describe). Two people CAN work a corner station just fine. Scot |
Previous by Date: | Re: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006, james creasy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006, Katie Kelly |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006, james creasy |
Next by Thread: | RE: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006, Katie Kelly |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |