Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Australian\s+Group\s+R\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Australian\s+Group\s+R\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Australian Group R (score: 1): Author: Jeremy Braithwaite <ATROZ@compuserve.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Dec 1997 23:00:20 -0500; The Australian Histroic Commission at its meeting on December 13th approv= the new Group R. The actual details are to be published in January - but essentially this allows FF up to the end of 1983 an; /html/vintage-race/1997-12/msg00483.html (8,422 bytes)
2. RE: Australian Group R (score: 1): Author: Andrew Pursey <MorrisOxford@s054.aone.net.au>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 21:00:55 +1100; "The Australian Histroic Commission at its meeting on December 13th = approved the new Group R. The actual details are to be published in January - but essentially this = allows FF up to the end of; /html/vintage-race/1997-12/msg00498.html (8,802 bytes)
3. RE: Australian Group R (score: 1): Author: Jeremy Braithwaite <ATROZ@compuserve.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 17:15:24 -0500; <<Well, that's just fine and dandy for you open wheeler guys - what about= us tin top people. I would have thought that now there is no excuse not to recognise Group C= Sedans (1973-84) as an offici; /html/vintage-race/1997-12/msg00514.html (8,697 bytes)
4. Re: Australian Group R (score: 1): Author: "John A. Rollins" <nobozos@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 06:17:41 -0800; For now, the SCCA Vintage program in Florida is holding to the pre-1973 cut-off date. This is due mainly to our being just another group on the normal SCCA program so we must compete for track time w; /html/vintage-race/1997-12/msg00527.html (8,430 bytes)
5. Re: Australian Group R (score: 1): Author: Jeremy Braithwaite <ATROZ@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 06:56:18 -0500; << For now, the SCCA Vintage program in Florida is holding to the pre-1973 cut-off date. This is due mainly to our being just another group on the normal SCCA program so we must compete for track ti; /html/vintage-race/1997-12/msg00542.html (8,648 bytes)
6. RE: Australian Group R (score: 1): Author: Andrew Pursey <MorrisOxford@s054.aone.net.au>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 1997 15:17:42 +1100; I guess the crunch point comes relative to the longevity of a particular = category. For example the Group C Touring Cars in Australia ran as a = distinct category from 1973 to 1984 (overlapped with; /html/vintage-race/1997-12/msg00559.html (10,656 bytes)
7. Re: Australian Group R (score: 1): Author: ply@adtrading.com (Patrick Young); Date: Sat, 27 Dec 1997 17:21:32 +0800; Great news on the Group R front - look forward to seeing this class get off the ground. And anyway, how much is the Reynard for a race? Of course the thing now is that with historic racing including; /html/vintage-race/1997-12/msg00573.html (9,510 bytes)
8. RE: Australian Group R (score: 1): Author: ply@adtrading.com (Patrick Young); Date: Sat, 27 Dec 1997 17:21:47 +0800; Andrew and Jeremy, Your comments on Group R (excellent idea) and Group C sedans (crazy name, crazy cars, presumably) raises a few interesting points. 1) Groups C sedans (as opposed to those luscious; /html/vintage-race/1997-12/msg00581.html (11,851 bytes)
9. Re: Australian Group R (score: 1): Author: Jeremy Braithwaite <ATROZ@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 06:04:47 -0500; <<Of course the thing now is that with historic racing including things built up to the end of 1983, then the obvious development is that HQ Holden racing is now an historic category. Who wants to t; /html/vintage-race/1997-12/msg00628.html (8,705 bytes)
10. RE: Australian Group R (score: 1): Author: Jeremy Braithwaite <ATROZ@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 06:04:59 -0500; <<3) As far as dates are concerned, a cut-off around 1983-84 seems fine t= o me as there has long been (or so it seems to me) a sort of unspoken cut-off date that at circa 15 years, a car is histori; /html/vintage-race/1997-12/msg00634.html (8,652 bytes)
11. Re: Australian Group R (score: 1): Author: ply@adtrading.com (Patrick Young); Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 21:26:55 +0800; At the risk of offending all Formula Vee owners, thank goodness for that. Regards, Patrick; /html/vintage-race/1997-12/msg00650.html (8,382 bytes)
12. RE: Australian Group R (score: 1): Author: ply@adtrading.com (Patrick Young); Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 21:27:00 +0800; As I understand it, they are talking about the original cars - after all there must be a fair whack of them which were built - i.e. enough to support a 30ish car grid. Really, I think the thing will; /html/vintage-race/1997-12/msg00651.html (8,360 bytes)
13. RE: Australian Group R (score: 1): Author: ply@adtrading.com (Patrick Young); Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 21:27:15 +0800; Given that we've been discussing Historic/classic FF2000 of late on this list, perhaps you could enlighten us as to the situation for running FF2000 cars in Australian Group R. They'd be cheap, not; /html/vintage-race/1997-12/msg00656.html (7,568 bytes)
14. RE: Australian Group R (score: 1): Author: ply@adtrading.com (Patrick Young); Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 21:27:03 +0800; Well with D-D's little collection and the Chris Smith conglomerate Ferrari and if only Mr. Briggs could/would race prepare his Williams FWo7, then we would be on our way to a good F1 grid in Oz. alr; /html/vintage-race/1997-12/msg00657.html (8,308 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]