Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+TR3\s+vs\s+TrR4\'s\s+experience\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+TR3\s+vs\s+TrR4\'s\s+experience\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TR] TR3 vs TrR4's experience (score: 1): Author: "Paul Dorsey" <dorpaul@negia.net>; Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:11:28 -0400; I guess the TR3 and TR4 driver sit equally close to the ground, right? But I bet the driving experience differs for several reasons, among them are: because of seat posture, height of doors, nearn; /html/triumphs/2006-09/msg00435.html (7,851 bytes)
2. Re: [TR] TR3 vs TrR4's experience (score: 1): Author: Geo & Kathleen Hahn <ahwahnee@cybertrails.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:33:48 -0700; I drive both, about equally and almost exclusively... and am amazed that 2 cars that share so many components can have such totally different character. You didn't mention steering but that is one of; /html/triumphs/2006-09/msg00437.html (8,209 bytes)
3. Re: [TR] TR3 vs TrR4's experience (score: 1): Author: Barry Schwartz <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 05:35:17 -0700; ** To be really amazed, try a Spitfire and a GT6. Talk about sharing components!! "Basically" the GT6 is a Spitfire with a fastback hard top and a six, but the cars are TOTALLY different in feel and; /html/triumphs/2006-09/msg00443.html (7,931 bytes)
4. Re: [TR] TR3 vs TrR4's experience (score: 1): Author: Bob Labuz <yellowtr@adelphia.net>; Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:56:41 -0400; Paul, Ask this question this time next year. The TR4 is still a work in progress. I had one back in the 70's but didnt have a 3 at the time to compare. I have started the fender body work but will ru; /html/triumphs/2006-09/msg00446.html (8,650 bytes)
5. Re: [TR] TR3 vs TrR4's experience (score: 1): Author: "Jim Muller" <jimmuller@rcn.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:29:00 -0400; I agree a whole heartedly. The GT6 really is a GT, at home on Interstate highways. (Except that the engine roarrrrrrrrrrs so loudly.) It also feels larger on the inside, perhaps due to the accessibil; /html/triumphs/2006-09/msg00448.html (7,686 bytes)
6. Re: [TR] TR3 vs TrR4's experience (score: 1): Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com; Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:53:23 EDT; To be really amazed, try a Spitfire and a GT6. Talk about sharing components!! "Basically" the GT6 is a Spitfire with a fastback hard top and a six, but the cars are TOTALLY different in feel and cha; /html/triumphs/2006-09/msg00451.html (7,912 bytes)
7. Re: [TR] TR3 vs TrR4's experience (score: 1): Author: "Tim OBrien" <obrienboys@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:04:24 -0600; Regarding the TR3 vs TR4 look and feel. I drive my TR4 regularly but had the chance to drive a better than new restored TR3 this year. I had always wished I had a 3 because of the beautiful lines, et; /html/triumphs/2006-10/msg00020.html (8,418 bytes)
8. Re: [TR] TR3 vs TrR4's experience (score: 1): Author: MMoore8425@aol.com; Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:08:30 EDT; Regarding the TR3 vs TR4 look and feel. I drive my TR4 regularly but had the chance to drive a better than new restored TR3 this year. I had always wished I had a 3 because of the beautiful lines, et; /html/triumphs/2006-10/msg00022.html (9,184 bytes)
9. Re: [TR] TR3 vs TrR4's experience (score: 1): Author: "Tim OBrien" <obrienboys@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:30:56 -0600; Absolutely not worth disputing. The TR3s will always be worth more, enjoy more status, etc. It's been well documented that that TR4 was considered a 'stop gap' type of car from a development standpoi; /html/triumphs/2006-10/msg00024.html (7,748 bytes)
10. Re: [TR] TR3 vs TrR4's experience (score: 1): Author: Geo & Kathleen Hahn <ahwahnee@cybertrails.com>; Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:47:06 -0700; Appears to be a 'boxers or briefs' question with personal preference and what was available when you were looking for one the main deciders. Geo H (TR3, TR4 & briefs). == This list supported in part; /html/triumphs/2006-10/msg00026.html (7,765 bytes)
11. Re: [TR] TR3 vs TrR4's experience (score: 1): Author: Michael Porter <portermd@zianet.com>; Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 13:12:43 -0600; But, that's not actual experiential difference. That's retention of value as an antique. Having driven both, I'd say that the additional track on the TR4 is an advantage, and once a little extra cast; /html/triumphs/2006-10/msg00027.html (9,322 bytes)
12. Re: [TR] TR3 vs TrR4's experience (score: 1): Author: MMoore8425@aol.com; Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 15:52:37 EDT; car" Appears to be a 'boxers or briefs' question with personal preference and what was available when you were looking for one the main deciders. Geo H (TR3, TR4 & briefs). George, I had the great ho; /html/triumphs/2006-10/msg00029.html (8,129 bytes)
13. RE: [TR] TR3 vs TrR4's experience (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:03:21 -0700; Tim, I guess your definition of "well-sorted" must be different than mine. Sounds to me like the car you drove falls into the same category as the show-winner that belches blue smoke while strugglin; /html/triumphs/2006-10/msg00031.html (7,968 bytes)
14. Re: [TR] TR3 vs TrR4's experience (score: 1): Author: zoboherald@aol.com; Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:45:52 -0400; Appears to be a 'boxers or briefs' question with personal preference and what was available when you were looking for one the main deciders. ==AM== I'm with you. Heck, back in the late 1960s, my dad; /html/triumphs/2006-10/msg00034.html (8,530 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]