Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Timing\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Timing? (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 14:43:30 -0700charset="iso-8859-1"
Thanks for all of the prompt replies to my firing order inquiry! The saga continues: I suspect my timing marks are off as the car runs awful at 4 degrees after TDC (doesn't run smooth without backfir
/html/triumphs/2000-08/msg00191.html (7,204 bytes)

2. Re: Timing? (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 21:23:04 -0400
To determine if the timing mark is off, remove the plugs, turn the engine over (I put it 4th gear and push) until the # 1 piston is coming up on the compression stroke and then place a long thin scr
/html/triumphs/2000-08/msg00201.html (8,083 bytes)

3. Re: Timing? (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 23:09:39 -0500charset="iso-8859-1"
-- Original Message -- From Bryce Milton <Bryce at Milton.com> at marks... Not much. US spec cars were timed for emission control, not to run well. The 4 degrees after timing spec is correct for my 7
/html/triumphs/2000-08/msg00202.html (7,799 bytes)

4. Re: Timing? (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 00:47:01 -0400
The 4 degrees ATDC timing was almost always (AFAIK, always) for cars with vacuum retard units, and that was dynamic timing at idle, all vacuum units in operation. The timing only SOUNDS horrid until
/html/triumphs/2000-08/msg00203.html (9,418 bytes)

5. Re: Timing? (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 10:39:12 -0700charset="iso-8859-1"
Well, the timing marks were indeed correct and the car's running a treat thanks to your replies and helpful suggestions... The car has all of the smog gear intact and properly connected (I know, it's
/html/triumphs/2000-08/msg00234.html (7,487 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu