Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MMT\s+$was\s+Octane\s+Boosters$\s+$no\s+LBC\s+at\s+all$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MMT\s+$was\s+Octane\s+Boosters$\s+$no\s+LBC\s+at\s+all$\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. RE: MMT (was Octane Boosters) (no LBC at all) (score: 1): Author: Mark Hooper <mhooper@pix-cinema.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:47:31 -0500; Ignoring the specific technical issue, what was presented on the CBC (which is very well regarded in its documentary work) and several other organisations was the following legal complication: NAFTA; /html/triumphs/2003-03/msg00818.html (13,056 bytes)
2. RE: MMT (was Octane Boosters) (no LBC at all) (score: 1): Author: "Paige, Dean" <DPaige@ci.santa-rosa.ca.us>; Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:03:46 -0800; It's becoming clear...in the case of MMT it was a US firm selling to Canada. In the case of MTBE Canadian firm was selling to the US. Enviro concerns raised on both chemicals by the respective buyers; /html/triumphs/2003-03/msg00819.html (14,035 bytes)
3. RE: MMT (was Octane Boosters) (no LBC at all) (score: 1): Author: Mark Hooper <mhooper@pix-cinema.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:30:07 -0500; You are so right there Dean. I didn't mean to fly off the handle and seem to be slamming the US. I should have known better. You are absolutely right about turnabout. In both cases it is ridiculous.; /html/triumphs/2003-03/msg00821.html (11,324 bytes)
4. RE: MMT (was Octane Boosters) (no LBC at all) (score: 1): Author: Randall Young <ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:21:30 -0800; It's funny you should say that Mark, since AFAIK the MTBE lawsuit is still pending, and it is exactly what you say : a Canadian company (Methanex) saying we have to use their poison in our gasoline; /html/triumphs/2003-03/msg00822.html (8,199 bytes)
5. MMT (was Octane Boosters) (no LBC at all) (score: 1): Author: "Jim Hill" <jrhill@chorus.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:28:29 -0600; We're getting a bit far afield here, and I'm hardly a defender of NAFTA, but I went to the source you cited and it certainly doesn't appear nearly as simple as a claim that "we have to use their pois; /html/triumphs/2003-03/msg00825.html (8,621 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]