Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+GT6\s+Questions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+GT6\s+Questions\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TR] GT6 Questions (score: 1): Author: "C E White" <BN_Knight@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:36:39 -0400; I've come across a 1970 GT6 for sale that interests me but I know only enough about them to be dangerous so I'm looking for guidance. First, a little about the car (from the owner's description). It; /html/triumphs/2006-06/msg00269.html (8,350 bytes)
2. Re: [TR] GT6 Questions (score: 1): Author: <jimmuller@rcn.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 13:36:24 -0400; Wonderful! But not the dangerous part, that's not wonderful. The GT6 was the original, sold inthe US as model years '67 and '68. The GT6+ was the upgrade sold in '69 and '70, badged as a GT6 Mk2 in o; /html/triumphs/2006-06/msg00273.html (9,641 bytes)
3. Re: [TR] GT6 Questions (score: 1): Author: Cameron Rooke <beaker211@rogers.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 14:27:57 -0400 (EDT); I have the MKIII GT6 and I know that many parts from the Spitfire fit the GT6. If you get the Victoria British catalogue for these two cars, you will see many part numbers that are the same for both; /html/triumphs/2006-06/msg00277.html (9,453 bytes)
4. RE: [TR] GT6 Questions (score: 1): Author: "Harvin Sauls (ML)" <lists@fusion.hopto.org>; Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 15:26:53 -0400; I was under the impression that the change over from Mk1 to Mk2 was mid-68 meaning that there are '68 Mk2's. H ________________________________ The GT6 was the original, sold inthe US as model years; /html/triumphs/2006-06/msg00279.html (7,543 bytes)
5. RE: [TR] GT6 Questions (score: 1): Author: <jimmuller@rcn.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 15:43:33 -0400; Could be. I think I seem to recall remembering vaguely that I've heard of '69 Mk1's too. And '81 Spitfires. In any case, the differences between a GT6 and a GT6+ are quite obvious, and CEW is looking; /html/triumphs/2006-06/msg00280.html (7,398 bytes)
6. Re: [TR] GT6 Questions (score: 1): Author: zoboherald@aol.com; Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 16:03:48 -0400; Could be. I think I seem to recall remembering vaguely that I've heard of '69 Mk1's too.... ==AM== Anything was possible, of course, but essentially the GT6+/Mk2 corresponded to the 1969 and 1970 MOD; /html/triumphs/2006-06/msg00281.html (7,974 bytes)
7. Re: [TR] GT6 Questions (score: 1): Author: TR250Driver@aol.com; Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 16:04:40 EDT; I have a GT6+ titled in Ohio as a 68. Jim did such a good job describing the differences that there is not much I an add. The 70 GT6+ and Spitfire MK 3 have unique rear tail lights for the one year o; /html/triumphs/2006-06/msg00282.html (7,553 bytes)
8. RE: [TR] GT6 Questions (score: 1): Author: Cameron Rooke <beaker211@rogers.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 16:17:37 -0400 (EDT); According to gt6.com, the mk2/+ was manufactured from July 1968 - Dec 1970. The confusion is probably due to the original registration dates of the cars vs. the manufacture dates. Many times in the p; /html/triumphs/2006-06/msg00283.html (7,879 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]