Mail Archive Search: <+from:itswonderful@attbi.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:itswonderful@attbi.com: 108 ]

Total 108 documents matching your query.

41. Center roll-over not correct (score: 1): Author: itswonderful@attbi.com; Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 19:42:05 +0000; A couple of days ago I described the method I called something like the "symmetrical center roll over method" for selecting push rod length for best valve train geometry. Well, even though this meth; /html/tigers/2003-02/msg00065.html (8,196 bytes)
42. Re: Center roll-over not correct (score: 1): Author: itswonderful@attbi.com; Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 22:30:05 +0000; I should clarify that I think it is possible to get the contact patch symmetrical with this approach but half lift will not occur when the tip is at the centerline of the stem but rather somewhere pa; /html/tigers/2003-02/msg00068.html (7,380 bytes)
43. RE: Center roll-over not correct (score: 1): Author: itswonderful@attbi.com; Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 22:35:48 +0000; This part bothers me. Wouldn't the movement be highest and equal at lowest lifts and again at highest lifts? Your working on equal parts of the arc on both sides of 90 degrees in this method. Frank; /html/tigers/2003-02/msg00069.html (7,310 bytes)
44. Re: Center roll-over not correct (score: 1): Author: itswonderful@attbi.com; Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 22:50:27 +0000; Yes, Comp Cams is who I was refering to as my push rod vendor. That is the method I used which I now believe to be incorrect. the second method I described and that Bob posted a description of seems; /html/tigers/2003-02/msg00072.html (10,346 bytes)
45. RE: You need .125 longer studs (score: 1): Author: "Frank Marrone" <itswonderful@attbi.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 15:40:25 -0800; Tim, that obviously was the case. Thanks. I already got the new studs in place and everything looks OK now. This roller rocker thing is new to me since I have not built a SBF motor for almost 20 year; /html/tigers/2003-02/msg00080.html (8,935 bytes)
46. RE: Desk top Dyno fun (score: 1): Author: "Frank Marrone" <itswonderful@attbi.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 15:58:09 -0800; I'm not sure it's all that simple. There is an effect of friction with the longer stroke configuration but that only accounts for part of the advantage the smaller motor. I'm not sure extra reciproc; /html/tigers/2003-02/msg00081.html (9,214 bytes)
47. RE: High Performance Water Pumps (score: 1): Author: "Frank Marrone" <itswonderful@attbi.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 18:16:09 -0800; Steve, a lot of folks look on the flow cooler pumps with disdain since they are just basically a standard pump with an extra set of vanes pop riveted to the impeller. Some testing done on Tigers have; /html/tigers/2003-02/msg00086.html (8,512 bytes)
48. RE: Desk top Dyno fun (score: 1): Author: "Frank Marrone" <itswonderful@attbi.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 18:49:03 -0800; Bob, but what I don't understand is why does the smaller motor make more power than the bigger motor at the SAME RPM at the high RPMs? My simplistic thinking would be that the bigger motor should mak; /html/tigers/2003-02/msg00090.html (8,273 bytes)
49. RE: Desk top Dyno fun (score: 1): Author: "Frank Marrone" <itswonderful@attbi.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 21:38:56 -0800; Derek, interesting! I don't think this is what is going on in the engine simulator however because there is no way to enter weights of reciprocating components in this software. The software would ha; /html/tigers/2003-02/msg00094.html (8,656 bytes)
50. RE: Desk top Dyno fun (score: 1): Author: "Frank Marrone" <itswonderful@attbi.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 21:43:20 -0800; Yes, my gut tells me this is the gist of it. Can anyone recommend a book that addresses these issues? I'd really like to read more about it. Frank; /html/tigers/2003-02/msg00095.html (8,263 bytes)
51. RE: Desk top Dyno fun (score: 1): Author: "Frank Marrone" <itswonderful@attbi.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 00:02:42 -0800; Some more studying and experience recently gained with a higher quality engine simulator program has led me to believe that Derek may be the most correct in this matter. I now believe that the prima; /html/tigers/2003-02/msg00149.html (11,872 bytes)
52. RE: Edelbrock F4B (score: 1): Author: "Frank Marrone" <itswonderful@attbi.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 22:44:29 -0800; I have two F4B manifolds. They are quite different with respect to mounting bosses they have and the configuration of the carb mounting flange. I do not believe either of them to be "correct" for the; /html/tigers/2003-02/msg00200.html (7,164 bytes)
53. RE: Alger or V8 Alpine? (score: 1): Author: "Frank Marrone" <itswonderful@attbi.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 22:35:15 -0800; Im positive that the Ford small block is actually 2 or more inches narrower than the 215/3500 V8. Also, depending on the source, some also report the Buick/Rover motor to be slightly taller than the; /html/tigers/2003-02/msg00218.html (8,238 bytes)
54. California is at it again (Cross posted) (fwd) (score: 1): Author: itswonderful@attbi.com; Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 03:23:49 +0000; This from the fordnatics Mailing list. Looks like it is time for us Californians to get busy writing our Senators one more time! Frank B9471116 In a currently bi-annual inspection exempt district --; /html/tigers/2003-02/msg00219.html (7,734 bytes)
55. SB708 contacts (score: 1): Author: "Frank Marrone" <itswonderful@attbi.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:34:33 -0800; For Californians here is a link to your Senators by city/district. I see that this info is a little tougher to find than usual right now, wonder why? http://www.calvoter.org/legguide/senateroster.htm; /html/tigers/2003-02/msg00222.html (6,441 bytes)
56. What, no Sunbeams!?! (score: 1): Author: itswonderful@attbi.com; Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 21:33:25 +0000; Frank; /html/tigers/2003-02/msg00228.html (6,360 bytes)
57. F4B modifications (score: 1): Author: itswonderful@attbi.com; Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 00:44:25 +0000; Hi, long ago I remember a discussion having to do with milling some material off the carb flange of the F4B manifold to gain some hood clearance. I understand that if you use the correct carburetor a; /html/tigers/2003-01/msg00013.html (6,606 bytes)
58. More F4b questions (score: 1): Author: "Frank Marrone" <itswonderful@attbi.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 17:31:16 -0800; What is the stock location for the throttle cable bracket? Does it mount to one of the intake manifold bolts? Where does the bracket mount on a typical F4B installation, same place? I have two versio; /html/tigers/2003-01/msg00057.html (7,015 bytes)
59. First, let me apologize... (score: 1): Author: itswonderful@attbi.com; Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 21:49:14 +0000; because I should know the answer to the question I'm about to ask. I tried hard to find the answer in my archives or on the web but I could not. I think the Tiger community needs a FAQ, I know this q; /html/tigers/2003-01/msg00110.html (7,429 bytes)
60. CAT Header question (score: 1): Author: "Frank Marrone" <itswonderful@attbi.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 10:15:32 -0800; DW, Does this mean that there will be more clearance around the oil filter like on the Cannon headers? Frank B9471116; /html/tigers/2002-11/msg00055.html (6,488 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]