Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:v6spitfireguy@cox.net: 111 ]

Total 111 documents matching your query.

21. Re: roto-flex vs swing axle (score: 1)
Author: Barry Schwartz <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 05:49:55 -0800
Sorry for the late response, I have been out of the country for the last couple of weeks Actually the design was very good but complex and costly (actually slightly better than the swing spring)- alb
/html/spitfires/2005-01/msg00016.html (7,204 bytes)

22. Re: axle vs spring lengths (score: 1)
Author: Barry Schwartz <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 04:28:17 -0800
The springs ARE all the same lengths (as the workshop dimensions indicate) - I have a swing spring in my GT6 setup - It woud appear to me that the upright is bent. The two upper sections should be mo
/html/spitfires/2005-01/msg00033.html (6,792 bytes)

23. Oil Filter ramblings- (score: 1)
Author: Barry Schwartz <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:41:41 -0800
While changing oil filter in the Spitfire, and about to on the Mustang, I got to wondering just why there are so many different sizes and shapes for them - I had to use a Motocraft 300 filter on my 1
/html/spitfires/2005-01/msg00071.html (8,085 bytes)

24. International postage question (Shipping parts, no LBC but car (score: 1)
Author: Barry Schwartz <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 13:38:27 -0800
I just sold an item (intake manifold) on eBay, an I am curious as to the postage rates I was quoted. The box measures 28" x 10" x 4" and weigh in at 11 lbs. It was won by someone in Germany, who is q
/html/spitfires/2004-12/msg00042.html (7,428 bytes)

25. International postage resolved! (score: 1)
Author: Barry Schwartz <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 04:46:58 -0800
Well it's unanimous! Seems like USPS is the overwhelming choice. Thanks guys (and gals) Barry Schwartz (San Diego) -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://w
/html/spitfires/2004-12/msg00046.html (6,590 bytes)

26. New email address for Barry Schwartz (score: 1)
Author: Barry Schwartz <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 14:02:39 -0800
We have just switched to high speed internet - which also means that the email address that I have had for a VERY long time will now change - for anyone thats interested - my old address of bschwart@
/html/spitfires/2004-11/msg00052.html (7,009 bytes)

27. Re: Rear shock mounting (score: 1)
Author: Barry Schwartz <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:03:40 -0800
While Im not sure which mounts you are refering to, since all GT6's and Spitfires have the same upper shock mounting points on the rear frame sturcture, which are part of the frame and not removable.
/html/spitfires/2004-11/msg00066.html (7,865 bytes)

28. Re: Rear shock mounting - clarified (score: 1)
Author: Barry Schwartz <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:54:12 -0800
I suppose, they would need to be fairly substantial to handle the loading. Joe Cury used to sell a bracket that would slip under the body and on top of the frame just for this purpose - you might che
/html/spitfires/2004-11/msg00068.html (7,451 bytes)

29. RE: U-Joint bolts (score: 1)
Author: "v6spitfireguy@cox.net" <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:50:50 -0500
Not sure exactly what you are trying to say but the bolts *should* have an unthreaded shoulder almost equal to or a little less than the thickness of both flanges. The reason for this is that it pro
/html/spitfires/2006-03/msg00050.html (7,933 bytes)

30. 5$ TRF shipping? (score: 1)
Author: Barry Schwartz <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 05:53:03 -0800
Does anybody that gets the TRF e-mail alerts know if this weekend is a 5$ shipping weekend? I seem to recall that I got an e-mail to that effect, but I deleted it and now (of course now that I need i
/html/spitfires/2006-03/msg00074.html (6,822 bytes)

31. 5$ shipping - (score: 1)
Author: Barry Schwartz <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:10:53 -0800
Well thanks guys, as usual if I had just waited a tad bit longer I would have got the e-mail before I sent out the request - and as some of you have already mentioned, It's back this weekend as well
/html/spitfires/2006-03/msg00077.html (6,650 bytes)

32. Re: LED running lights for TRs (score: 1)
Author: Barry Schwartz <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:37:44 -0800
I Have tried several brands, and configurations of these with differing numbers of LED's and the main problem that I have found, aside from the fact that a standard flasher won't work with them (must
/html/spitfires/2006-02/msg00011.html (8,742 bytes)

33. Re: springs (score: 1)
Author: Barry Schwartz <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 04:59:32 -0800
** Larry, the spring pictured in the fore ground appears to NOT be a fixed spring but a swing spring missing the fixed portion or bottom leaf. Those large loops at the end house the smaller eyes of
/html/spitfires/2006-01/msg00059.html (7,275 bytes)

34. Re: Replacing Top/Bottom Windscreen seals (score: 1)
Author: Barry Schwartz <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 05:20:29 -0800
yes, the seal can be replaced, the windscreen frame does in fact bolt in from the top and bottom. To reach the bolts and replace the seal at the top the headliner must be out of the way though - whic
/html/spitfires/2006-01/msg00072.html (7,807 bytes)

35. Re: Replacing Top/Bottom Windscreen seals (score: 1)
Author: Barry Schwartz <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 05:50:40 -0800
It does in fact come out. Once all the bolts are removed, it can be tilted forward and removed. The lower post brackets/clamps must also be removed (two bolts on each side way up under there) to allo
/html/spitfires/2006-01/msg00073.html (10,530 bytes)

36. Re: Front and Rear Sidemarker Lamps Rubber Plinth for Spitfire (score: 1)
Author: Barry Schwartz <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 05:23:03 -0700
No sorry, but I did make a solid model of them in Pro-E several years ago so if anyone needs it to start production - I would let them use it - Fortunately, even after 34 years mine are still good -
/html/spitfires/2006-05/msg00084.html (6,970 bytes)

37. Stainless steel brake hoses anyone? (score: 1)
Author: "v6spitfireguy@cox.net" <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 20:47:37 -0400
Well looks as though I got lucky yesterday coming home from work. The Spitfire brakes seemed to be getting a little mushy, and I was getting that typical "pedal slowly drops to the floor" typical of
/html/spitfires/2006-06/msg00011.html (8,064 bytes)

38. RE: Wheel bearing problem (score: 1)
Author: "v6spitfireguy@cox.net" <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 16:11:02 -0400
Without the proper axle flange pulling tool (or reasonable facsimile) it is highly unlikely you will be able to remove the axle flange without destroying it. Simply taking it to a machine shop to sti
/html/spitfires/2006-06/msg00047.html (7,559 bytes)

39. Silicon fluid color change? - (score: 1)
Author: Barry Schwartz <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:56:29 -0700
While I was upgrading my brake system with the new stainless hoses and refilling the master cylinder I noticed a peculiar thing about the fluif - I use Silicon fluif and when I started to pour the ne
/html/spitfires/2006-06/msg00056.html (7,764 bytes)

40. Re-using Silicon brake fluid? (score: 1)
Author: Barry Schwartz <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 05:57:29 -0700
Now before you start the flames, I am quite aware of why you don't re-use old conventional brake fluid, and am not in anyway recommending to do this - but...I was bleeding the wife s Mustang brakes t
/html/spitfires/2006-07/msg00062.html (8,129 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu