Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR\s+2000\s+sedan\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR\s+2000\s+sedan\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. TR 2000 sedan (score: 1): Author: Dick Nyquist <dickn@hpspdbc.vid.hp.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Jan 1995 10:39:12 -0800 (PST); I have a '66 2000 which I paid $300 for, then added $700 in paint and body work at Miracle. It is a great car, it handles well and runs well. The one thing that would be a vast improvement in mine w; /html/british-cars/1995-01/msg00097.html (8,272 bytes)
2. Re: TR 2000 sedan (score: 1): Author: britcars@hpfckjs.fc.hp.com; Date: Wed, 4 Jan 95 14:29:27 MST; Dick's description of the mounting differences may have helped me identify and engine and trany I picked up recently. The engine is a 6 cyl. like the GT6 but the mounting points are on the front pla; /html/british-cars/1995-01/msg00103.html (8,710 bytes)
3. Re: TR 2000 sedan (score: 1): Author: blaced@CHMA.CIBA.COM (D. Lacey); Date: Thu, 5 Jan 95 12:19:07 +0100; On the subject of canted six cylinder triumph engines, the 2000/2500 range of saloons all had their engine canted over 6 (?) degrees to allow adequate clearance of the alternator on the battery tray.; /html/british-cars/1995-01/msg00118.html (7,303 bytes)
4. Re: TR 2000 sedan (score: 1): Author: "Doug Mitchell" <doug@dsg128.nad.ford.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Jan 1995 07:04:22 -0500; ^^^^^^^^ I don't think so, Kevin. The Amphicar was only built with a four cyl. Same lump as the Herald. Doug Mitchell; /html/british-cars/1995-01/msg00120.html (7,667 bytes)
5. RE: TR 2000 sedan (score: 1): Author: dan parslow <DJP@ALPHA.SUNQUEST.COM>; Date: Thu, 5 Jan 1995 10:05:46 -0700 (MST); [a description of a 6-cyl engine designed to be mounted at an angle] This is quite definitely a Triumph 2000 engine. This was similar to a Mk I GT6 engine, but without the block castings for the side; /html/british-cars/1995-01/msg00129.html (7,690 bytes)
6. Re: TR 2000 sedan (score: 1): Author: Dick Nyquist <dickn@hpspdbc.vid.hp.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Jan 1995 09:24:50 -0800 (PST); a 2000 For sure. the 2000 engine was mounted at about a 15 degree angle to vertical. As for the Amphicar I thought they used the Harold/Spit engine. /Dick Nyquist; /html/british-cars/1995-01/msg00130.html (7,422 bytes)
7. Re: TR 2000 sedan (score: 1): Author: Dick Nyquist <dickn@hpspdbc.vid.hp.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Jan 1995 09:28:17 -0800 (PST); The most interesting A 2000 for sure. The 2000 engine sat at about a 15 degree angle to vertical. As for the Amphicar I thought they used the Harold/Spit engine. /Dick Nyquist; /html/british-cars/1995-01/msg00131.html (7,409 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]