Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR\-4\s+vs\.\s+TR\-4A\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR\-4\s+vs\.\s+TR\-4A\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. TR-4 vs. TR-4A (score: 1): Author: <mit-eddie!crd.GE.COM!passaretti@EDDIE.MIT.EDU> ("Mr. Mike" Passaretti); Date: Wed, 22 Aug 90 12:09:32 EDT; Ok, it's time to admit my ignorance of the underlying parts and ask "What's the difference between these two cars". Is one or the other of them more "competable" in Autocross etc? I'll be the first t; /html/british-cars/1990-08/msg00241.html (7,516 bytes)
2. Re: TR-4 vs. TR-4A (score: 1): Author: mit-eddie!hoosier.utah.edu!mjb@EDDIE.MIT.EDU (Mark Bradakis); Date: Wed, 22 Aug 90 12:09:14 -0600; Boy, mention the word autocross and TR4 in the same sentence and I could go on for a bit. I'll try to stick to the basics, and not too long winded. The main difference between the 4 and the 4A is the; /html/british-cars/1990-08/msg00242.html (9,835 bytes)
3. Re: TR-4 vs. TR-4A (score: 1): Author: mit-eddie!wsl.dec.com!kent@EDDIE.MIT.EDU; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 90 11:35:22 PDT; The TR-4 is, in many ways, the end of the series of cars that started with the TR-2; the -4A is, in many ways, the beginning of the series of cars that led to the incredibly long-running TR-6. The 4; /html/british-cars/1990-08/msg00246.html (8,293 bytes)
4. Re: TR-4 vs. TR-4A (score: 1): Author: mit-eddie!hoosier.utah.edu!mjb@EDDIE.MIT.EDU (Mark Bradakis); Date: Wed, 22 Aug 90 15:07:11 -0600; Yeah, that's a good way to put it. Oh, did I say that? I guess I am trying to prove it by example. Maybe I'll run a Spit AND The White Car next year. After all, TWC did have one of the fastest raw t; /html/british-cars/1990-08/msg00249.html (7,230 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]