Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:josh@sirota.org: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: considering an FF (score: 1)
Author: "Josh Sirota" <josh@sirota.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:52:38 -0800
And the majority of the pages in the Pegasus catalog are suddenly relevant! /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Ar
/html/autox-cm/2004-12/msg00010.html (8,529 bytes)

2. Re: CM F2000 (score: 1)
Author: "Josh Sirota" <josh@sirota.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 15:45:31 -0800
Here's my take. Correct me where my assumptions are wrong. I believe that there are not a lot of people who already have road-racing formula cars who are anxious to come try autocrossing. Therefore,
/html/autox-cm/2004-01/msg00008.html (9,248 bytes)

3. Re: CM F2000 (score: 1)
Author: "Josh Sirota" <josh@sirota.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:58:47 -0800
Gary -- you don't count. You and Tim are autocrossers, who built competitive autocross cars, which can also be road raced. The demographic we're interested in is all of those road racers with legal F
/html/autox-cm/2004-01/msg00010.html (7,694 bytes)

4. Re: Going Past the FF2000 performance analysis (score: 1)
Author: "Josh Sirota" <josh@sirota.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 15:16:41 -0800
I'll use one of my previous statements in the context of this "primary concern" ... It does not make sense to add more classes unless you have participants to fill them, or at a minimum, believe in "
/html/autox-cm/2004-01/msg00022.html (8,475 bytes)

5. Re: Member input requested (score: 1)
Author: "Josh Sirota" <josh@sirota.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 22:14:35 -0800
So, one of the reasons that people want a more competitive place for an FF2000 is because it's one of the cheapest ways to run a winged car ... right? Doesn't the proposal call for removing the wings
/html/autox-cm/2003-12/msg00007.html (7,997 bytes)

6. Re: CM F2000 (score: 1)
Author: "Josh Sirota" <josh@sirota.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 11:40:09 -0800
What is it Tommy, are you afraid of those FF2000s kicking your ass in BM? Seriously, I'm not a fan of restrictors and huge weight penalties to try to produce equality. These sorts of things just prod
/html/autox-cm/2003-12/msg00033.html (9,376 bytes)

7. Re: CM F2000 (score: 1)
Author: "Josh Sirota" <josh@sirota.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 14:05:55 -0800
Again, even if the performance were on par ... Why the heck would someone wanting to enter the class go and buy a cool-looking race car with wings, only to be forced to remove the wings? What is the
/html/autox-cm/2003-12/msg00036.html (13,721 bytes)

8. Re: CM F2000 (score: 1)
Author: "Josh Sirota" <josh@sirota.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 09:51:11 -0800
Chuck -- a single class in Pro Solo for mod cars isn't new. I think it was '95 (but maybe '94 or '96) when the same thing was done (actually prepared was included as well, if I recall, because I reme
/html/autox-cm/2003-12/msg00050.html (15,570 bytes)

9. Re: CM F2000 (score: 1)
Author: "Josh Sirota" <josh@sirota.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:49:01 -0800
Thanks Mark. Look, here's another big statement like my last one: 1) The only reason to talk about futzing with the classing in the formula car classes is because you want to increase participation i
/html/autox-cm/2003-12/msg00055.html (13,746 bytes)

10. Re: GCR FF2000 in C+ Mod (or B- Mod?) (score: 1)
Author: "Josh Sirota" <josh@sirota.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:16:45 -0800
"supplemental" class status for with BM class being awarded until given a fair chance (a full year?), anything, number of entries in this Chris, As I said in the past, if I decided to get back into t
/html/autox-cm/2003-12/msg00060.html (8,436 bytes)

11. Re: CM F2000 (score: 1)
Author: "Josh Sirota" <josh@sirota.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:09:00 -0800
Well, I don't mind the idea of a regulated zero AOA for the wings ... but it's HAVING the wings at all that makes the car more interesting to me. /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@
/html/autox-cm/2003-12/msg00066.html (8,055 bytes)

12. Re: Gearing, again (score: 1)
Author: "Josh Sirota" <josh@sirota.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:53:56 -0700
That makes sense. But on the other hand, when I broke my 16:36 second gear years back in San Diego in a torrential downpour, it was neither high-traction nor bumpy! So I think if they're going to br
/html/autox-cm/2003-07/msg00031.html (8,664 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu