Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*clarifications\s+to\s+FM\s+exhaust\s+protest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*clarifications\s+to\s+FM\s+exhaust\s+protest\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: clarifications to FM exhaust protest (score: 1): Author: "J. Brett Howell" <jbrett@pebblemotorsports.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:07:03 -0400; That's an interesting point Mark. I'd be very interested in hearing some proof of your theory that the effective length of the pipe as results from the addition of a perforated stinger does not effe; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00161.html (10,547 bytes)
2. Re: clarifications to FM exhaust protest (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:25:34 -0400 (EDT); I based that statement on dyno testing we did on my '94 and '96 RS125 roadracing bikes. Two exhaust cans, one 2" longer than the other, otherwise identical. HP difference was in the noise range of t; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00164.html (11,459 bytes)
3. RE: clarifications to FM exhaust protest (score: 1): Author: "Glen Thompson" <glen.thompson@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 22:12:05 -0400; Maybe all the other cars without mufflers should have been protested for excessive noise. If you have to comply with one part of the rule you have to comply with all parts. glen Rule is in the GCR: E; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00176.html (8,263 bytes)
4. Re: clarifications to FM exhaust protest (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 10:19:23 -0400; a Note, however, that the rule in the GCR does not restrict TOTAL exhaust length, but rather, the length of the exhaust behind the rear axle centreline. I'd lay dollars to doughnuts that the intent o; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00190.html (8,838 bytes)
5. Re: clarifications to FM exhaust protest (score: 1): Author: "J. Brett Howell" <jbrett@pebblemotorsports.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:27:37 -0400; I know it is not necessary for me to explain the effects of exhaust length, inner diameter, backpressure, etc. on the powerband of a motor. I will say that given the fact that the limitations impose; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00197.html (11,196 bytes)
6. Re: clarifications to FM exhaust protest (score: 1): Author: "Rick Brown" <free2000@quixnet.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 17:29:06 -0700; I know, one of the pieces of equipment for impound should be a lie detector! Rick Brown BM / D Sports Racer /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00224.html (8,445 bytes)
7. Re: clarifications to FM exhaust protest (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 20:34:39 -0500; I believe your point is correct. If the solo rules cite GCR and do not state an exception, then the GCR rule must be completely complied with. If it mandates a specific sound limit for the specific c; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00250.html (12,714 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]