Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Texas\s+NT\s+\&\s+the\s+SO\s+class\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Texas\s+NT\s+\&\s+the\s+SO\s+class\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Texas NT & the SO class (score: 1): Author: "Su Brude" <sbrude@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 19:43:26 -0600; I can lurk no longer. As most of you know that where at the NT I was very vocally challenged from a nasty case of larengides (sp?). For some reason I thought that should keep me from saying what I ne; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00863.html (10,446 bytes)
2. RE: Texas NT & the SO class (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 18:28:29 -0700; Wow, what I'm finding amazing is that, although Su and I did talk (nice meeting you, Su!), I can't even remember us talking about the S.O. class! This is, to me, even MORE proof that this class is hi; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00865.html (9,442 bytes)
3. RE: Texas NT & the SO class (score: 1): Author: "James Gambony" <BritBits@tiu.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 22:50:39 -0500; I've missed most of this discussion... could you clarify? Is there going to be one big "SO" class, or one for each of the existing classes? If the point is to let an "SO" run in an event without the; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00873.html (11,926 bytes)
4. Re: Texas NT & the SO class (score: 1): Author: Craig Blome <cblome@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 05:30:14 -0700 (PDT); hmm...maybe the '58 Plymouth Fury in "Christine"?; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00877.html (7,133 bytes)
5. Re: Texas NT & the SO class (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 15:30:09 -0400; Maybe I'm missing the point just as much as everyone else, but I think I have a solution that addresses everyone else's concerns and won't bother Katie too much. How about the only qualification for; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00896.html (8,056 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]