Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Course\s+design\/speed\s+limits\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Course\s+design\/speed\s+limits\s*$/: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: John Lieberman <johnlee@softdisk.com>; Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 16:12:39 -0800; Excellent point, David. A pre-drive is always better than having to change things after the event has started. But, if you can't work in a pre-drive, you can at least have one or two of the fastest S; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00049.html (8,952 bytes)
2. Re: Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: LOTUSRCN@aol.com; Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 01:43:09 EST; << My point was geared more toward verifying the 75 mph Neon comment that appeared early in this thread. Well, from my point of view, and I was at the National tour in SD. My Son was one of the cours; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00079.html (7,965 bytes)
3. Re: Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: John Lieberman <johnlee@softdisk.com>; Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 14:57:01 -0800; BINGO! That's the point I was trying to make. Let's say you know that a given car runs out of second gear at 63 mph. You watch his run and note that on the fastest part of the course he bumped into t; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00144.html (7,083 bytes)
4. Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: Jeff Cashmore <cashmo@execpc.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 10:35:13 -0600; Randy wrote... "I think that it is hard for someone who is only used to slow/small courses to hit a gate at 75mph and know that they can make it stick." Mari Clements pointed out that section 2.1 in; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01608.html (8,329 bytes)
5. Re: Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: "Justin Hughes" <ka1ult@channel1.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 12:11:33 -0500; I agree strongly with both statements. Personally, I wouldn't want to hit a gate at 75 in my bare bone stock econobox, even if it could go that fast to begin with! It would even be questionable in m; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01610.html (9,680 bytes)
6. Re: Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: Mike Bultemeier <hottvr@tfs.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 11:13:46 -0600; Should we talk about this? Can anything good come from it? Just lie down and be quiet!!!!!!!!! Mike(Still owe Linnhoff payback) B. TLS#1; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01611.html (8,929 bytes)
7. Re: Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 11:26:04 -0600; == I'll bet you say that to all the sheep. :^P See you on course. Eric Linnhoff in KC '98 Neon R/T <eric10mm@qni.com> You jump in front of my car When you know all the time That 90 miles an hour Gir; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01613.html (8,383 bytes)
8. Re: Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: Scott & Glenda Meyers <autox@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 11:28:14 -0700; A friend in a Neon relayed to me after this SD event that he entered at least one corner at 75+ mph, and he's not one of the faster drivers - going to relevance here, not commenting on his ability :-; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01618.html (11,588 bytes)
9. Re: Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: John Whitling <alliancemillsoft@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 13:55:57 -0500; If we spent all of our time on slow autox courses I wouldn't still be doing For me, your normal Pro Solo is SLOW solo. No fun. Too small, too slow. You don't have to be 75 in a stocker to have some f; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01619.html (13,248 bytes)
10. Re: Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: Josh Sirota <jss@marimba.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 11:29:36 -0800; While I do think that the SD NT was atypically fast, I don't believe for a second that any Neons were doing over 75mph. Standard posturing, claiming speeds higher than they were. Anyone remember the; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01621.html (9,008 bytes)
11. Re: Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: Rex Tener <rex@marimba.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 11:28:46 -0800; I don't believe it. If a Formua Ford was at 80+ mph, and it was flat out the whole way, there is no way a Neon was at 75+ mph. My estimate for my M3 on that section was 65 to 67 mph, which was flat f; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01622.html (8,587 bytes)
12. Re: Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 13:30:26 -0600; still be doing this. What exactly do you mean by "slow?" If you've got enough time to look at your speedometer in a Solo II run, you're not going as fast as you can. Maybe this just isn't your sport,; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01623.html (10,057 bytes)
13. Re: Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: Jeff Blankenship <jblanken@itds.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 13:47:24 CST; Hear hear! I got the same feeling at Divisionals my first year - I chickened out big-time because I was not used to the awesome wide-open spaces that enable some good-sized straights. To make matters; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01624.html (12,177 bytes)
14. Re: Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: Mike Bultemeier <hottvr@tfs.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 13:58:00 -0600; I agree. I am only starting my second season in SoloII. I came to SoloII for the of racing but without the risks of road racing. I want to go fast and test the limits of myself and my car. I think co; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01626.html (9,019 bytes)
15. Re: Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: "Justin Hughes" <ka1ult@channel1.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:26:09 -0500; If it can be done safely, I don't see why not. To me, "safely" would mean a larger than normal overrun area at the end of the high speed straight, just in case an inexperienced hotshoe gets in over; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01627.html (10,386 bytes)
16. Re: Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:55:53 -0500 (EST); Phrased like that, I'd say 'yes' to 1 and 'I dunno' to 2. HOWEVER, when I hear stories of a Z3 spinning out at a national event and hitting a fence, its blindingly clear that in fact the course was; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01629.html (9,776 bytes)
17. Re: Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 16:04:52 -0500 (EST); The other thing to keep in mind when speeds start getting high is that the problem may not be some rank amateur badly overshooting the start of braking, but an equipment failure. By its nature, you'; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01630.html (10,116 bytes)
18. Re: Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: John Whitling <alliancemillsoft@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 16:10:56 -0500; You're name is familiar to me, even here in the hills of Ohio. I think you're on the left coast somewhere, aren't you? Certainly you must be autoxer of some repute. Anyways, no I never do get a chan; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01631.html (12,222 bytes)
19. RE: Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: "Bill Fuhrmann" <bfuhrman@isd.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:26:03 -0600; It might also be a problem if going faster ment that insurance was no longer available at reasonable cost for the events.; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01632.html (8,765 bytes)
20. Re: Course design/speed limits (score: 1): Author: RacerRay52@aol.com; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 16:29:21 EST; I like fast, open, simple courses. It isn't so much raw speed that causes most of the trouble. It is those sudden, very tight offsets, those left-right-left maneuvers at the end of a reasonably moder; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01633.html (9,123 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]