- 1. Re: BMW M3's in ESP - again. (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Guard <David.Guard@sdrc.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 17:20:33 -0400
- Re: Whining from back markers. I thought this list was about opinions and discussion topics related to autox. Maybe some have gotten opinion mixed up with whining. If that's the case, should back mar
- /html/autox/2000-09/msg00312.html (7,958 bytes)
- 2. RE: BMW M3's in ESP - again. (score: 1)
- Author: Nicholas Horton <nhorton@reliacom.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 17:50:40 -0400
- Speaking of M3's, anyone know where the new E46 M3 is going to be classed?
- /html/autox/2000-09/msg00313.html (8,893 bytes)
- 3. Re: BMW M3's in ESP - again. (score: 1)
- Author: "Chris Teague" <cteague@home.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 18:04:29 -0700
- Likely in SS, or the new stock 1 class. At that point, the M Coupe with ~315 or so HP may be a better SS car. The E46 M3 is supposed to be around ~330 HP, but is heavier than the M Coupe. Chris
- /html/autox/2000-09/msg00316.html (9,536 bytes)
- 4. RE: BMW M3's in ESP - again. (score: 1)
- Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 17:06:34 -0400
- <<<Speaking of M3's, anyone know where the new E46 M3 is going to be FSP? Paul Foster
- /html/autox/2000-09/msg00336.html (6,647 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu