Speaking of M3's, anyone know where the new E46 M3 is going to be classed?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Guard [mailto:David.Guard@sdrc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 5:21 PM
> To: ax-digest@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: BMW M3's in ESP - again.
>
>
> Re: Whining from back markers.
>
> I thought this list was about opinions and discussion topics related
> to autox.
>
> Maybe some have gotten opinion mixed up with whining.
> If that's the case, should back markers be limited from contributing
> (opinion or whine) ? If we're limiting relevant input to only
> those who
> finish in the top of their class... this list should be
> pretty quiet all
> week :-o
>
> So unless this list is only for tops in the class, I say its OK to
> re-kindle
> old discussion topics. The old thread died with, "let's wait and see
> what
> happens at Nationals". Well, its Nationals. The ProSolo results were
> interesting, as are Day 1 results. The big gal is coming on stage
> tomorrow.
>
> (rekindling the old thread) The argument that got the E36 M3
> moved to ESP was "it was too fat for CSP". However, we also class
> the E36 M3 lightweights in ASP. Think about it, one car that covers
> almost the complete range of the SP index. Seems odd that aluminum
> doors make that much difference :-). I made the suggestion to reclass
> the
> E36 M3 to ASP and put it on the same line as the lightweights.
>
> Its a shame the ESP entries were down so much from last year
> (37 vs 51).
>
> F-Stock grew 58 vs. 40, CP grew 66 vs. 53, so its not like interest in
> Pony cars is fading.
>
> Dave Guard
> ESP ' 93 Cobra Mustang.
> (back marker at Nationals ? could be, might have been mid-pack -
> it doesn't matter!!!)
>
> Headed for cover...
>
|