Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*350Z\s+Vs\.\s+Boxster\s+and\s+S2000\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*350Z\s+Vs\.\s+Boxster\s+and\s+S2000\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. 350Z Vs. Boxster and S2000 (score: 1): Author: BRUBEL51@aol.com; Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:44:46 EST; I need an analysis from the team.Net subscribers; Think about the following. Based on all the data that has been written and read, I see that the 350Z should and will be an overachiever in the B Stoc; /html/autox/2003-02/msg00133.html (8,094 bytes)
2. RE: 350Z Vs. Boxster and S2000 (score: 1): Author: "Rick Brown" <rbrown7@covad.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:25:30 -0800; Yes, read the review. I think Rodent Track was being very gracious to Nissan including comparisons to a 911 and a Z06. Speaking of power to weight, the new Z is more a like a Benz CLK430 or a V8 f-bo; /html/autox/2003-02/msg00134.html (9,107 bytes)
3. Re: 350Z Vs. Boxster and S2000 (score: 1): Author: "Patrick Washburn" <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:38:41 -0600; Personally I think that we need to just wait and see what happens during it's initial and tentative classing. It is closest to BS cars IMO, therefore I feel it is in the right place to begin with. SE; /html/autox/2003-02/msg00135.html (8,817 bytes)
4. RE: 350Z Vs. Boxster and S2000 (score: 1): Author: "Graeme Weston-Lewis" <gweston@lsil.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 13:06:03 -0700; Talking to one of our local Club Racing hot-shoes who has the track model, he told me that it suffers from significant understeer at the track. Autocross tends to amplify these track tendencies. I be; /html/autox/2003-02/msg00136.html (8,785 bytes)
5. RE: 350Z Vs. Boxster and S2000 (score: 1): Author: "Bradley H. Lamont" <lamont@mailhost.org>; Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 15:25:06 -0600; Agreed. With Pat Salerno & Carter Thompson driving 350Z's this year, we should get a good feel for the car's capabilities pretty quickly. Brad -- Bradley Lamont lamont@mailhost.org http://www.over6ra; /html/autox/2003-02/msg00137.html (8,090 bytes)
6. Re: 350Z Vs. Boxster and S2000 (score: 1): Author: "Brian Berryhill" <bikepoet@netzero.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 23:14:56 -0600; Just remember that weight/power ratios aren't applicable to autocross. The Z may be faster in a straight line by a little bit, but the extra weight will be the normalizer. Momentum courses might fav; /html/autox/2003-02/msg00141.html (8,648 bytes)
7. Re: 350Z Vs. Boxster and S2000 (score: 1): Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:54:38 -0800 (PST); I considered purchasing a 350Z when the water seals went out on my 93 Rx7 R1's 13B-REW... then i went out and apologized to my car, and paid the $12,000 to rebuild it (new engine with upgraded water; /html/autox/2003-02/msg00143.html (9,635 bytes)
8. Re: 350Z Vs. Boxster and S2000 (score: 1): Author: "jeff parker" <lugnutparkers@ev1.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:26:29 -0600; So, did you marry a 16 year old or get a Russian mail-order bride? :) Jeff /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Par; /html/autox/2003-02/msg00149.html (7,810 bytes)
9. Re: 350Z Vs. Boxster and S2000 (score: 1): Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:07:35 -0800 (PST); Canadian Internet bride actually :) she's 22. we met playing EverQuest... -- Scott M. Stone <sstone@foo3.com> Cisco Certified Network Associate, Sun Solaris Certified Systems Administrator /// unsubs; /html/autox/2003-02/msg00154.html (8,082 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]