Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2001\s+Stock\s+Class\s+Proposal\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2001\s+Stock\s+Class\s+Proposal\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. 2001 Stock Class Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Rick Cone" <conekiller@prodigy.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 18:46:04 -0400; I have gone through the effort and taken the 2000 Solo 2 Nationals and 'reworked' the results to show how things would have been if the proposal were in place this year. Yes I know it is all hypothet; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00389.html (7,782 bytes)
2. Re: 2001 Stock Class Proposal (score: 1): Author: "kent rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 19:42:39 -0400; Nice effort Rick. I'm, ah, "concerned" that the new Boxter S is #1 in S2 right out of the box. There was very little development time in that car as far as I know and it still beat some very evolved; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00394.html (8,407 bytes)
3. RE: 2001 Stock Class Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 16:58:32 -0700; Yeah get that Boxster S out of SS2..... Jason "RX7 KLR" Isley jason.isley@alltel.com Nice effort Rick. I'm, ah, "concerned" that the new Boxter S is #1 in S2 right out of the box. There was very litt; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00395.html (8,901 bytes)
4. RE: 2001 Stock Class Proposal (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:21:10 EDT; Why are we making a class for C4's only? If we are going to remove a car that has more TQ, and better Gearing from it's current class... just to make room for the new and improved, why is this not do; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00412.html (9,449 bytes)
5. Re: 2001 Stock Class Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Chuck McMillion" <chuck@decaturnet.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:32:38 -0500; I couldn't agree more! That is my Major complaint with the restructure proposal. There are several people in C4 vettes in stock class running VERY close, if not beating other cars. You know who you a; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00413.html (10,475 bytes)
6. Re: 2001 Stock Class Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:47:26 -0400; The C5 will only get faster - the C4 is probably pretty close to maximally tweaked in Stock. I think the resurrection of BSP shows there is a very large "market" of C4s that'll come out if they have; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00415.html (10,398 bytes)
7. RE: 2001 Stock Class Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:11:50 -0700; I think a bit of development time will show what the C5 can do. Regardless of the fact that the C5 in 1st place had the high dollar shocks and all that good stuff, they had that car only about 3 week; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00416.html (11,154 bytes)
8. RE: 2001 Stock Class Proposal (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:30:21 EDT; The same C5 only took 5th at the Pro. Curt drove well... but in no way is there any past races that would show that the C4 & C5's are mis-classed. If anything the only car that could be deemed 'mis-c; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00423.html (11,821 bytes)
9. Re: 2001 Stock Class Proposal (score: 1): Author: CoulterKotzian@aol.com; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:03:09 EDT; Hey Mr. RX7KLR, wouldn't you agree that if the C4 Vette belongs in a different class than the C5, the RX-7 should remain in the class with the C4, since the C4, in your own words, "kills" the RX-7?; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00425.html (7,714 bytes)
10. RE: 2001 Stock Class Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:01:21 -0700; No... Just my C4 is the RX7 KLR. ;) I will have to give my plate to Schotz for his C5. Jason "996 KLR" Isley jason.isley@alltel.com Hey Mr. RX7KLR, wouldn't you agree that if the C4 Vette belongs in; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00432.html (8,184 bytes)
11. Re: 2001 Stock Class Proposal (score: 1): Author: Bob Monday <boysrus_racing@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:59:53 -0700 (PDT); Interesting study, Rick: SS goes from 50 cars to 28. DS goes from 28 cars to 67. Exactly what good are we accomplishing here? Obviously these are the two classes impacted most heavily! The only thing; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00438.html (8,452 bytes)
12. RE: 2001 Stock Class Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:07:50 -0700; Yeah, DC is not building a new ACR because of solo2.. "Oh no we wont have or own class and we wont sell those extra 50 cars so we better bag the ACR program". lol Just by chance if you have not be pa; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00439.html (9,019 bytes)
13. Re: 2001 Stock Class Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 23:21:21 -0500; guys. == Actually "our" money is going to the NASCAR guys and "world" racing venues (F1). But it's just too bad that Daimler had to come in and screw up a perfectly good grassroots program. And you; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00457.html (9,639 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]