Why are we making a class for C4's only? If we are going to remove a car that
has more TQ, and better Gearing from it's current class... just to make room
for the new and improved, why is this not done for FS? Why are 3rd & 4th Gen
Camaro's still together? It is the same situation. Let alone the 3rd gen
F-Body's have 305 5spds! and 350 w/Auto's! The 4th Gen's have 100 more HP...
same TQ, and 6spds? For the first time in 4 years the C5 places ahead of the
c4's. Definitely not enough of a reason to separate the Vettes????
Dave Schotz
In a message dated Mon, 9 Oct 2000 8:01:41 PM Eastern Daylight Time, "Isley,
Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com> writes:
<< Yeah get that Boxster S out of SS2.....
Jason "RX7 KLR" Isley
jason.isley@alltel.com
-----Original Message-----
From: kent rafferty [mailto:gs96@sgi.net]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 4:43 PM
To: 'team.net'
Subject: Re: 2001 Stock Class Proposal
Nice effort Rick. I'm, ah, "concerned" that the new Boxter S is #1 in S2
right out of the box. There was very little development time in that car as
far as I know and it still beat some very evolved Corvettes, including the
well known L98s of McClure, Johnson, and Isley and even an LT4 with mega-$$$
shocks and established drivers. That should be indication enough that the S
should be in S1, but that's my opinion and I'm way biased.
Kent Rafferty
> I have gone through the effort and taken the 2000 Solo 2 Nationals and
> 'reworked' the results to show how things would have been if the proposal
> were in place this year.
>
> Yes I know it is all hypothetical, but it's the best basis we have to
> evaluate this proposal.
>
> Rick Cone
>
> http://pages.prodigy.net/conekiller/2001Proposal.xls
>
>
>>
|