Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:sstone@foo3.com: 46 ]

Total 46 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Towing Question: Dodge Dakota (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:31:51 -0800 (PST)
I have a 98 Durango which is a similar vehicle... in stock trim with the 5.2L, the owners manual says towing capacity is about 6200 pounds - more than enough. 7200 if you have the 5.9 R/T engine but
/html/autox/2003-04/msg00038.html (8,930 bytes)

2. Re: CA Alert (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:54:34 -0800 (PST)
I agree. Perhaps if they made CA law more sane and said that people could make engine/exhaust modifications to their cars at will, provided that the amount of HC/CO/CO2 coming out the pipe was within
/html/autox/2003-03/msg00038.html (8,024 bytes)

3. tow vehicle question (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 15:26:22 -0800 (PST)
I was messing around with my dodge durango 4x4 in the parking lot the other day and I noticed that if I put the transfer case in either 4-Part-Time-High, 4-Full-Time-High, or 4-Part-Time-Low, and i t
/html/autox/2003-03/msg00040.html (7,989 bytes)

4. Re: tow vehicle question (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 17:13:54 -0800 (PST)
i'm not really sure on this - but when i put the thing in the 4L position, the "4WD PART TIME" light comes on, not the "4WD FULL TIME" light. -- Scott M. Stone <sstone@foo3.com> Cisco Certified Netwo
/html/autox/2003-03/msg00045.html (9,002 bytes)

5. Re: tow vehicle question (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:22:56 -0800 (PST)
I did. in 1998 at least you had a choice of two transfer cases: 1. 2WD/4-PT-HIGH/4-LOW 2. 2WD/4-PT-HIGH/4-FT-HIGH/4-LOW mine has #2, which according to the sticker, cost an extra $395 or so. I dont k
/html/autox/2003-03/msg00049.html (8,932 bytes)

6. Re: tow vehicle question (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 11:12:31 -0800 (PST)
ok, i finally figured out the Durango's transfer case... MY durango at least has the part-time and full-time 4WD transfer case, and also has a limited-slip rear differential, both of which were optio
/html/autox/2003-03/msg00094.html (10,054 bytes)

7. Re: Is AutoX for Me? (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:23:05 -0800 (PST)
do we really want to attract reckless drivers who endager others to the sport, though? -- Scott M. Stone <sstone@foo3.com> Cisco Certified Network Associate, Sun Solaris Certified Systems Administrat
/html/autox/2003-03/msg00135.html (7,847 bytes)

8. RE: Is AutoX for Me? (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:27:51 -0800 (PST)
how much of it is spent racing, and how much of it is spent sitting in the heat? how do you keep your wife from complaining about being bored and standing around in the heat when you have 8 run group
/html/autox/2003-03/msg00136.html (8,190 bytes)

9. Re: FS-93-95 Mazda RX7 Pre-cat (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 14:36:30 -0800 (PST)
re: my previous post - i should specify that my car is a 93 Rx7 R1... -- Scott M. Stone <sstone@foo3.com> Cisco Certified Network Associate, Sun Solaris Certified Systems Administrator /// unsubscrib
/html/autox/2003-03/msg00146.html (7,237 bytes)

10. Re: FS-93-95 Mazda RX7 Pre-cat (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 14:35:59 -0800 (PST)
FWIW I replaced my precat with a downpipe, and it still *easily* passed emissions - in California even! and the guy even looked under the car... -- Scott M. Stone <sstone@foo3.com> Cisco Certified Ne
/html/autox/2003-03/msg00147.html (7,313 bytes)

11. Re: Is AutoX for Me? (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 14:41:50 -0800 (PST)
true. I only autocrossed for one season back in 1994, but i've carried the skills with me. Enough so that last year when going 80 on the freeway at night and the pickup truck in front of me lost some
/html/autox/2003-03/msg00148.html (8,743 bytes)

12. Re: Proposal for vintage-oriented autocross class. (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:42:08 -0800 (PST)
how about "no more than 1.5" wider than stock, period". wouldn't that solve it? why not just say "wheels no larger than 16" or 1" larger than stock, whichever is GREATER", then the corvette guys can
/html/autox/2003-03/msg00177.html (10,163 bytes)

13. Re: Proposal for vintage-oriented autocross class. (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:50:09 -0800 (PST)
it sounds like an interesting proposal. Wish I could run in it, but I don't think I could justify a 1993 Rx7 R1 as a "vintage" car yet :) -- Scott M. Stone <sstone@foo3.com> Cisco Certified Network A
/html/autox/2003-03/msg00179.html (9,013 bytes)

14. re:Proposal for vintage-oriented autocross class. (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 17:24:31 -0800 (PST)
bah, you should make an exception for the 1st gen Rx7s - they're every bit as "vintage" and "classic" as the 240/260Z... i've owned 5 Rx7s and 3 Z-cars, including a 1971 240Z, a 1979 Rx7, a 1982 Rx7,
/html/autox/2003-03/msg00197.html (9,774 bytes)

15. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: PRO at Talledega (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:28:54 -0800 (PST)
"macs tend to stay in service longer" is largely a function of "people who buy macs are casual users who want email and have the thing smile at you when you turn it on". At least in the home market.
/html/autox/2003-02/msg00065.html (9,264 bytes)

16. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: PRO at Talledega (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 18:41:43 -0800 (PST)
they preach to their own choir, though. Apple made their Big Mistake back in the early 80s. The *only* way they can recapture a significant amount of the PC market is to roll out a reasonably fast ma
/html/autox/2003-02/msg00067.html (10,284 bytes)

17. Re: your mail (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 15:52:19 -0800 (PST)
first or second gen Rx7 comes to mind (79-85, 86-91) -- Scott M. Stone <sstone@foo3.com> Cisco Certified Network Associate, Sun Solaris Certified Systems Administrator /// unsubscribe/change address
/html/autox/2003-02/msg00098.html (7,136 bytes)

18. Re: 350Z Vs. Boxster and S2000 (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:54:38 -0800 (PST)
I considered purchasing a 350Z when the water seals went out on my 93 Rx7 R1's 13B-REW... then i went out and apologized to my car, and paid the $12,000 to rebuild it (new engine with upgraded water
/html/autox/2003-02/msg00143.html (9,635 bytes)

19. Re: 350Z Vs. Boxster and S2000 (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:07:35 -0800 (PST)
Canadian Internet bride actually :) she's 22. we met playing EverQuest... -- Scott M. Stone <sstone@foo3.com> Cisco Certified Network Associate, Sun Solaris Certified Systems Administrator /// unsubs
/html/autox/2003-02/msg00154.html (8,082 bytes)

20. Re: Insurance for a new driver? (score: 1)
Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:35:11 -0800 (PST)
she's 22. And that's good to hear, about the insurance... although I think Allstate does it differently, my premiums go down based on the number of years I've had my license. I'd love to. I haven't m
/html/autox/2003-02/msg00168.html (9,086 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu