Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:msmith2@columbus.rr.com: 166 ]

Total 166 documents matching your query.

61. Re: SM2 Stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 17:26:24 -0500
Oh, so it should be in GS and ESP too, right? :-P Mike CP 58
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00858.html (8,153 bytes)

62. Re: Supra=Japanese Camaro? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 19:23:15 -0500
Because, within this statement, The only part that does not apply to a Supra, or a 300ZX 2+2, is the 4.5L V8 part. Although most would agree that the Supra and 300ZX are just as capable of spinning t
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00862.html (7,877 bytes)

63. Re: WRX Classing (fanning the flames...) (score: 1)
Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 23:39:36 -0500
Not that it matters to me much, but if an Audi S4 really does weigh 3700lbs, the M3 is about 800lbs lighter... There's only, what, a 10HP difference? Not hard to see at all why they're in different
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00048.html (7,475 bytes)

64. Re: Disclaimer: Underwire Bras (score: 1)
Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 20:31:16 -0500
I think y'all really meant silicone, the soft squishy stuff, not silicon, the indestructible stuff computer chips are made of. I would think silicon would be painful enough on it's own, nevermind a c
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00221.html (8,883 bytes)

65. Re: Re:2001 rule books? (score: 1)
Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 01:54:19 -0500
These days Eric, Crays are slow too... BTW, It's Windows that makes .PDF readers slow.... However, they run just fine under UNIX...<grin> Mike CP58 fairly
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00255.html (8,904 bytes)

66. Re: Re:2001 rule books? (score: 1)
Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 02:46:32 -0500
I like your math... 1% of the users, 75% of the whining, but we get 90% of the work done... Hmmmmm.. <grin> And Eric L., it's the Microsoft Optical Mouse that has no balls......<grin> So, do ya thin
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00258.html (9,098 bytes)

67. Re: 2001 rule books? (score: 1)
Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 22:39:00 -0500
how Only about 70-80% of the servers on the internet are UNIX boxes... Nah, that's not many at all. Granted, it's not basic user friendly, but some versions are getting VERY close.... Mike CP58
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00299.html (8,544 bytes)

68. Re: WRX (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 21:32:45 -0500
The port of entry is NOT a dealer. You cannot buy the car from them. Since it's an official part of Subaru's network, it's still the "factory". It remains the "factory" until it arrives at the point
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00614.html (8,135 bytes)

69. Re: HANS in slo-motion comparison (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 22:41:26 -0500
I gotta better idea, let's see a real-time comparison of a stock-car driver getting out of the car with, and without, the current HANS design in place. If there's a significant difference, there's a
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00669.html (8,058 bytes)

70. Re: HANS in slo-motion comparison (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 01:55:04 -0500
The question is, does it take him any longer to get out because of it. Sure, after the race it doesn't matter, but in an upside-down car on fire it just might... Mike
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00676.html (7,363 bytes)

71. Re: Saturns on two wheels! (score: 1)
Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 01:36:44 -0500
Back when I ran an ES SL2, I had an event where an off-camber turn and my relentless pursuit of the "then ES" Neon ACR, resulted in me having my 4-door about a foot and half up in the air. I ended u
/html/autox/2001-01/msg00342.html (8,718 bytes)

72. Re: Street Mod exclusions, was: What's wrong with this picture? (score: 1)
Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 23:24:37 -0500
I agree, a SMX could work, at least until you tried to quantify it for national status. We have X classes out here and, while they work, I think it would be difficult to setup a national-level equal
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00069.html (8,221 bytes)

73. Re: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1)
Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 23:40:24 -0500
Umm, you really need to stop and look at what's possible with SM's 1st off, ANY engine labeled with your marque's name is legal. 2nd, ANY forced induction is legal, given engine size limits. I think
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00070.html (8,426 bytes)

74. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 13:02:05 -0500
They might fear it, but the starlet and others of it's kind are part of the SM makeup. If one blows the class off, you have to look at WHAT it blew off. If the 2nd place car wasn't even half-way thru
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00082.html (9,062 bytes)

75. Re: SM no superchargers? (score: 1)
Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 03:06:11 -0500
It's 3.0L for OHC engines and 4.0L for pushrod engines. Mike CP58 liters. is 8V, thought damn
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00120.html (7,103 bytes)

76. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 18:22:35 -0500
Sorta like Street Prepared is now......... So, licensing has no meaning in SP, just it doesn't in SM.... Seeing how SM inherited it rule base from SP, that just doesn't seem that bad. So what if the
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00134.html (8,821 bytes)

77. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 18:40:00 -0500
And lights, and wipers, and heaters, and tread, and stereos, and.... Why not? The chink in the armor of any SM car will be tires, pure and simple. Again, so what? Is there something inherently wrong
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00135.html (9,378 bytes)

78. Re: SM exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 18:43:57 -0500
is a Not to mention that, at 3.5L and it having pushrods, is perfect for a supercharger in SM. The real question would be, is it any better than a 3.8L Buick V6 for the same purpose? Mike CP58
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00136.html (6,999 bytes)

79. Re: Demographics Now (score: 1)
Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 20:03:44 -0500
about If it costs half as much, it must be more than twice as old...... 100 less horse power and ~600 less pounds...... Besides, when Porsches become a primary target for Sport Compact Car magazine,
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00191.html (7,813 bytes)

80. Re: Street Mod notes (score: 1)
Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 00:18:21 -0500
$10 says you couldn't make a competitive run in that thing and NOT end up on your roof... Mike CP58
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00206.html (8,163 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
This search system is powered by Namazu