Mail Archive Search: <+from:knuckledragger@kcweb.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:knuckledragger@kcweb.net: 381 ]

Total 381 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Towing - Regular Van vs. Extended Van (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 13:58:25 -0500; What I want to know is what on earth did you hit that was large enough to total an E350? =8^O Oh, and of course I hope everybody is alright. Eric -- Original Message -- but; /html/autox/2004-12/msg00013.html (7,489 bytes)
42. Re: California DMV chief wants to track all drivers with GPS (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 08:02:15 -0500; First off, I have no gripe about being legitimately caught for a driving offense by a member of the law enforcement community. I did it, and was caught red-handed. It happens infrequently enough, com; /html/autox/2004-12/msg00045.html (10,605 bytes)
43. RE: STS tires (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:51:24 -0600; There are multiple problems with your proposal. Firstly, that size isn't available in all brands. But more importantly, cars that could or would use a 205/50-15 tire might suffer too great of a geari; /html/autox/2004-12/msg00088.html (7,434 bytes)
44. RE: STS tires (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:54:24 -0600; Maybe there should be a rule change for ST classes to require all season min treadwear 400 tires. Then AWD would really dominate. Dick (who knows that you understand even if many of the "street tire"; /html/autox/2004-12/msg00089.html (7,497 bytes)
45. Re: STS tires (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 07:43:30 -0500; -- Original Message -- == Agreed. For most of the "smaller" STS cars, a 23" tall tire is ideal. "Good" tires roughly filling that order include: 195/60-14 (yuck, as if) 205/50-15 225/45-15 (Sadly, no; /html/autox/2004-12/msg00092.html (7,222 bytes)
46. Re: NOPI autocrossing (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:05:07 -0500; Why? I'd give up our helmet requirement for "The Honeys" in a heartbeat! Eric -- Original Message -- http://www.autoweek.com/files/specials/galleries/nopi/autocross/pages/index. htm; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00029.html (6,755 bytes)
47. Re: Buyer Beware! Guy Ankeny & Guy Ankeny Racing (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 07:48:48 -0500; -- Original Message -- == Especially if she is cute and drives a cool car. ;^) Eric (not cute, but single) Linnhoff in KC '98 Mini-Viper #69 STS http://www.geocities.com/eric10mm/KnuckleDragger; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00057.html (8,255 bytes)
48. Re: Polar Express handbrake turn (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:35:32 -0500; Oh LORD! Drifting has hit the big screen now! ;^) Eric -- Original Message -- pretty; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00059.html (6,674 bytes)
49. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:55:21 -0500; What about side air bags? And rear seat air bags? And how about seats that have air bags integrated into them? Sooooo many questions. Me? I'll take every last chance to survive a bad head-on crash th; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00092.html (10,040 bytes)
50. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 07:42:35 -0500; == Where's Nader these days? Eric; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00111.html (8,859 bytes)
51. Re: Nader (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:20:33 -0500; I think they call that "acceptable losses" in HRT lingo. Funny though, most nations around the world have an acceptable figure of up to 50%. You do NOT want to be that dumb hostage in Germany that co; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00125.html (6,940 bytes)
52. Re: [evolution-disc.] annual tech and online rules? (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:06:50 -0500; It's simple. Really, it is. If there is no actual requirement in the current rules for each Solo2 participant to have in their possession a current Rule book, as is often written into an event's Supp; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00165.html (9,760 bytes)
53. Re: [evolution-disc.] annual tech and online rules? (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:04:24 -0500; Hey, this ain't go-karts down at the local putt-putt mini-golf range or doing donuts in an empty church parking lot with nobody else around. We play a semi-dangerous game here and we need rules to pr; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00168.html (10,570 bytes)
54. Re: [evolution-disc.] annual tech and online rules? (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:14:31 -0500; -- Original Message -- == A region's tax status is another prefectly good reason for requiring all participants to be members. Something about too much of the club's income percentage coming from non; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00173.html (9,483 bytes)
55. Re: [evolution-disc.] annual tech and online rules? (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:50:21 -0500; Our head local bean counter said, after we were recently audited, that we were dangerously close to losing our NFP status. At least part of the "problem" was the percentage of "non-member" income bei; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00178.html (10,092 bytes)
56. Re: [evolution-disc.] annual tech and online rules? (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:26:10 -0500; Settle down, take another toke off the peace pipe. Go back a few posts and read Dave Whitworth's response about the St. Louis region's tax audit woes. That is real and they're right down the road fro; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00183.html (10,238 bytes)
57. Re: [evolution-disc.] annual tech and online rules? (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:46:53 -0500; No harm, no foul, David. Anyone who has been around these lists a while knows that I've suffered from foot-in-mouth syndrome a time or twelve myself. ;^) Eric -- Original Message --; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00194.html (9,547 bytes)
58. RE: [evolution-disc.] annual tech and online rules? (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 07:13:53 -0600; --Original Message-- That's not to mention the fact that sometimes books get lost, stolen or forgotten. It would be a real shame to turn away someone who has just driven hundreds of miles but forgot; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00206.html (9,993 bytes)
59. RE: [evolution-disc.] annual tech and online rules? (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 10:20:12 -0600; --Original Message-- .... the same rulebook gets passed thru more hands than a 5.00 prostitute in the registration line. == They had those there? DAMMIT! I knew I was concentrating on the donuts too; /html/autox/2004-11/msg00217.html (8,913 bytes)
60. Re: Tires For Sale (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:02:57 -0400; I'm surprised there's anything left to sell after Flat-Spot Roberts drove your car at the Nats. ;^) Eric; /html/autox/2004-10/msg00021.html (6,445 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]